The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 9
Average rating: 6.87
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 44.98
№2
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 725
Ratio Superior: 32.78
№3
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.3
TTFR rankings: 1239
Ratio Superior: 29.29
№4
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.89
TTFR rankings: 1021
Ratio Superior: 29.26
№5
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 27.01
№6
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.27
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 26.94
№7
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.53
TTFR rankings: 1262
Ratio Superior: 24.98
№8
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.2
TTFR rankings: 916
Ratio Superior: 24.62
№9
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 22.24
№10
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.09
TTFR rankings: 629
Ratio Superior: 20.9
№11
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.11
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 20.86
№12
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.09
TTFR rankings: 620
Ratio Superior: 20.6
№13
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.73
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 20.57
№14
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.94
TTFR rankings: 801
Ratio Superior: 20.57
№15
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.26
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 20.16
№16
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.73
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 20.03
№17
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.77
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 18.14
№18
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.4
TTFR rankings: 587
Ratio Superior: 18.12
№19
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.14
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 18.1
№20
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.77
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 17.95
№21
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.56
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 17.83
№22
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.94
TTFR rankings: 1358
Ratio Superior: 17.42
№23
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.73
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 17.37
№24
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.88
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 17.35
№25
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.11
TTFR rankings: 1634
Ratio Superior: 17.18
№26
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.26
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 17.03
№27
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.53
TTFR rankings: 818
Ratio Superior: 16.19
№28
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.61
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 16.11
№29
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 56.63
TTFR rankings: 907
Ratio Superior: 16.02
№30
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.26
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 15.93
№31
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.53
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 15.42
№32
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.23
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 15.41
№33
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 115.33
TTFR rankings: 1771
Ratio Superior: 15.36
№34
Age: 9
Average rating: 6.87
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 15.14
№35
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.4
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 15.12
№36
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.56
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 15.09
№37
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.61
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 15.07
№38
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.83
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 14.52
№39
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 105.67
TTFR rankings: 1524
Ratio Superior: 14.42
№40
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.77
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 14.39
№41
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 87.8
TTFR rankings: 1254
Ratio Superior: 14.28
№42
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.58
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 13.94
№43
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 13.91
№44
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.87
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 13.88
№45
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 72.24
TTFR rankings: 986
Ratio Superior: 13.65
№46
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 66.04
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 13.6
№47
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79.62
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 13.48
№48
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.94
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 13.23
№49
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 7.98
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 13.16
№50
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 91.03
TTFR rankings: 1187
Ratio Superior: 13.04
№51
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.27
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 13.02
№52
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.56
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 12.93
№53
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.19
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 12.93
№54
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.94
TTFR rankings: 499
Ratio Superior: 12.81
№55
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 12.77
№56
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.51
TTFR rankings: 555
Ratio Superior: 12.47
№57
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.56
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 12.45
№58
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.54
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 12.38
№59
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.54
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 12.38
№60
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.26
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 12.34
№61
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.4
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 12.28
№62
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.58
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 12.12
№63
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.53
TTFR rankings: 606
Ratio Superior: 11.99
№64
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.19
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 11.78
№65
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 7.57
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 11.62
№66
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.6
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 11.6
№67
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.26
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 11.58
№68
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.23
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 11.49
№69
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.3
TTFR rankings: 484
Ratio Superior: 11.44
№70
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 11.4
№71
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 7.57
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 11.36
№72
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.33
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 11.34
№73
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 6.12
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 11.27
№74
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.1
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 11.14
№75
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 11.12
№76
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.1
TTFR rankings: 773
Ratio Superior: 11.03
№77
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.32
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 10.97
№78
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.09
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 10.93
№79
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.73
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 10.88
№80
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 84.88
TTFR rankings: 917
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№81
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.54
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№82
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.67
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 10.76
№83
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.31
TTFR rankings: 808
Ratio Superior: 10.73
№84
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.54
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 10.66
№85
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.36
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 10.62
№86
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79.62
TTFR rankings: 840
Ratio Superior: 10.55
№87
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.73
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 10.52
№88
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.93
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 10.5
№89
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.3
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 10.5
№90
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.89
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 10.46
№91
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.87
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 10.44
№92
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.26
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 10.43
№93
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.54
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 10.34
№94
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.68
TTFR rankings: 533
Ratio Superior: 10.31
№95
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.26
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 10.31
№96
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.56
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 10.18
№97
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.63
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 10.13
№98
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.53
TTFR rankings: 512
Ratio Superior: 10.13
№99
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.83
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 10.01
№100
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 161.96
TTFR rankings: 1617
Ratio Superior: 9.98
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
