A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Dyjas Jakub

Wins: 33

Defeats: 17

Ratio: 1.94

Number of matches: 50

R_max: 26100

R_1,2,3: 23671

R_min: 85

R_1,2,3: 486

Synergistic effect: 1.71

№2

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Robinot Quentin

Wins: 8

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 2.67

Number of matches: 11

R_max: 12153

R_1,2,3: 7613

R_min: 15723

R_1,2,3: 19315

Synergistic effect: 1.02

№3

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Kou Lei

Wins: 4

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 10886

R_1,2,3: 6199

R_min: 17247

R_1,2,3: 17832

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Devos Robin

Wins: 39

Defeats: 41

Ratio: 0.95

Number of matches: 80

R_max: 10474

R_1,2,3: 6446

R_min: 2445

R_1,2,3: 3011

Synergistic effect: 0.96

№5

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Tokic Bojan

Wins: 4

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 4

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 7684

R_1,2,3: 5306

R_min: 8990

R_1,2,3: 8990

Synergistic effect: 1.41

№6

Pair: Jean Lauric
Nuytinck Cedric

Wins: 5

Defeats: 11

Ratio: 0.45

Number of matches: 16

R_max: 4008

R_1,2,3: 3870

R_min: 3034

R_1,2,3: 3206

Synergistic effect: 1.13

№7

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Rogiers Benjamin

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 3904

R_1,2,3: 3238

R_min: 3780

R_1,2,3: 3780

Synergistic effect: 1.23

№8

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Pitchford Liam

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2910

R_1,2,3: 2910

R_min: 6986

R_1,2,3: 6986

Synergistic effect: 0.41

№9

Pair: Hotz Christian
Nuytinck Cedric

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2503

R_1,2,3: 2503

R_min: 3936

R_1,2,3: 3936

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Lambiet Florent

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1667

R_1,2,3: 1667

R_min: 4878

R_1,2,3: 4878

Synergistic effect: -

№11

Pair: Nuytinck Cedric
Rassenfosse Adrien

Wins: 7

Defeats: 7

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 14

R_max: 1127

R_1,2,3: 566

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 226

Synergistic effect: 1.41