A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Olah Benedek
Oconnor Miikka

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 3973

R_1,2,3: 2975

R_min: 4650

R_1,2,3: 4650

Synergistic effect: 1.64

№2

Pair: Oconnor Miikka
Lundstrom Thomas

Wins: 4

Defeats: 10

Ratio: 0.4

Number of matches: 14

R_max: 1933

R_1,2,3: 1437

R_min: 1162

R_1,2,3: 1271

Synergistic effect: 2.46

№3

Pair: Oconnor Miikka
Myllarinen Markus

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 1187

R_1,2,3: 785

R_min: 2016

R_1,2,3: 2292

Synergistic effect: 1.94

№4

Pair: Oconnor Miikka
Naumi Alex

Wins: 1

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 265

R_1,2,3: 265

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Tennila Otto
Oconnor Miikka

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2954

R_1,2,3: 2954

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Tomlinson Simon
Oconnor Miikka

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3483

R_1,2,3: 3483

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Oconnor Miikka
Kantola Roni

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1635

R_1,2,3: 1635

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Oconnor Miikka
Bernadet Antoine

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4452

R_1,2,3: 4452

Synergistic effect: -