A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Kamal Shahd
John Lydia

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 760

R_1,2,3: 760

Synergistic effect: -

№2

Pair: Zarins Tova
John Lydia

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1910

R_1,2,3: 2096

Synergistic effect: -

№3

Pair: John Lydia
Hursey Anna

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1606

R_1,2,3: 2202

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: John Lydia
Richards Beth

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 240

R_1,2,3: 830

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: John Lydia
Nielsen Thea

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: John Lydia
Whitton Lara

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2143

R_1,2,3: 2143

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: John Lydia
Baldwin Mari

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2106

R_1,2,3: 2106

Synergistic effect: -