The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
2501
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.78
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2502
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 158.4
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2503
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 10.94
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2504
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 199.66
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2505
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.64
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2506
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.48
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2507
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2508
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2509
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2510
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2511
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2512
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.57
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2513
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.57
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2514
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.39
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.73
2515
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.11
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2516
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 290.39
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2517
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.61
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2518
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.08
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2519
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.63
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2520
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.04
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2521
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 184.91
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2522
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.62
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2523
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.39
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2524
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 113.09
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2525
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.57
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2526
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.24
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2527
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.24
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2528
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.08
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2529
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 326.91
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2530
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.65
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2531
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.65
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2532
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.95
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2533
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 329.1
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2534
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.15
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2535
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.75
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2536
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.59
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2537
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.59
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2538
Age: 9
Average rating: 11.37
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2539
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.39
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2540
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.77
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2541
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.77
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2542
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.85
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2543
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 214.26
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2544
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.72
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2545
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.83
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2546
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.08
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2547
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.92
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2548
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.02
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2549
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.39
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2550
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.89
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2551
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.89
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2552
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.62
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2553
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.44
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2554
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.78
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2555
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.11
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2556
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.7
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2557
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.28
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2558
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.91
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2559
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.91
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2560
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.91
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2561
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 166.38
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2562
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 11.68
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2563
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 11.68
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2564
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2565
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.39
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2566
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.09
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2567
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.6
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2568
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.11
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2569
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.11
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2570
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.45
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2571
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.7
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2572
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.7
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2573
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.7
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2574
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.28
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2575
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.28
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2576
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.31
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2577
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2578
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.67
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2579
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.39
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2580
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.62
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2581
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.53
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2582
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.53
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2583
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.64
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2584
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.83
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2585
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.28
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2586
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.37
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2587
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 235.55
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2588
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.51
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2589
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.03
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2590
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.54
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2591
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.12
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2592
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.11
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2593
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.07
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2594
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2595
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.24
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2596
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.63
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2597
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.85
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2598
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.85
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2599
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.14
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2600
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.63
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.66

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников