The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
2101
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.43
2102
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 139.11
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 0.42
2103
Age: 13
Average rating: 45
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.42
2104
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.85
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.42
2105
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.85
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.42
2106
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 80.93
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.42
2107
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 159.21
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.41
2108
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.24
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.41
2109
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.24
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.41
2110
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.6
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.41
2111
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 56.55
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.41
2112
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.81
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.41
2113
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 7.47
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.4
2114
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.74
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.4
2115
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.74
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.4
2116
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 209.38
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 0.4
2117
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 64.91
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.4
2118
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 127.84
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.4
2119
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.54
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.4
2120
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 181.82
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 0.4
2121
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.15
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2122
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.15
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2123
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 104.16
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2124
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2125
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.98
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2126
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.8
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2127
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.37
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2128
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 7.69
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2129
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 56.55
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2130
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 224.43
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2131
Age: 14
Average rating: 67.46
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.39
2132
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 80.93
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2133
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.06
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2134
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.46
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2135
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 71.02
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2136
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.71
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2137
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.55
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2138
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.55
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2139
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.55
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2140
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 119.34
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2141
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2142
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.59
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.38
2143
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.19
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.37
2144
Age: 15
Average rating: 94.09
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.37
2145
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.73
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.37
2146
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.78
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.37
2147
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.78
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.37
2148
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 172.03
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 0.37
2149
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 74.07
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.36
2150
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.93
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.36
2151
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 224.43
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 0.36
2152
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.38
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.36
2153
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.38
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.36
2154
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 104.16
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.36
2155
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.99
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2156
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2157
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.48
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2158
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.98
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2159
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.59
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2160
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.93
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2161
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 104.16
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2162
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.79
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2163
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.79
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.35
2164
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 46.74
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2165
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.71
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2166
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.92
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2167
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.27
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2168
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.85
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2169
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.85
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2170
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.85
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2171
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 83
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2172
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.86
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2173
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.74
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.34
2174
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.86
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2175
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.2
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2176
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.19
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2177
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.41
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2178
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.7
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2179
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.7
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2180
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 79.74
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2181
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.37
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2182
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.37
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.33
2183
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.55
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2184
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.14
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2185
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.54
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2186
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.54
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2187
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 68.98
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2188
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.73
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2189
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.59
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2190
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 91.21
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2191
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 6.3
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2192
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 6.3
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2193
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.46
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2194
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.46
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2195
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.46
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2196
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.46
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2197
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 63.22
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2198
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 142.33
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.32
2199
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.31
2200
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.31

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников