The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
201
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.67
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 7.05
202
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 8.37
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 7.05
203
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 82.55
TTFR rankings: 581
Ratio Superior: 7.04
204
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.23
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 7.03
205
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.73
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 7.03
206
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.19
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 6.97
207
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.83
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 6.97
208
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.36
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 6.95
209
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 7.98
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 6.89
210
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 105.67
TTFR rankings: 728
Ratio Superior: 6.89
211
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 101.85
TTFR rankings: 701
Ratio Superior: 6.88
212
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.33
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 6.88
213
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 72.24
TTFR rankings: 496
Ratio Superior: 6.87
214
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.33
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 6.84
215
Age: 9
Average rating: 6.87
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 6.84
216
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 110.93
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 6.83
217
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.62
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 6.81
218
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.26
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 6.8
219
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.73
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 6.79
220
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 10.85
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 6.73
221
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 272.67
TTFR rankings: 1834
Ratio Superior: 6.73
222
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.73
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 6.72
223
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.53
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 6.72
224
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.62
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 6.7
225
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.3
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 6.69
226
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 6.65
227
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.34
TTFR rankings: 361
Ratio Superior: 6.64
228
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.54
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 6.64
229
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.4
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 6.64
230
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 99.9
TTFR rankings: 661
Ratio Superior: 6.62
231
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.09
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 6.61
232
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.77
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 6.59
233
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.63
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 6.57
234
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.32
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 6.56
235
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 6.56
236
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 6.51
237
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.53
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 6.51
238
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.53
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 6.51
239
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.11
TTFR rankings: 618
Ratio Superior: 6.5
240
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.63
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 6.49
241
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.94
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 6.49
242
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 6.49
243
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.36
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 6.47
244
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.26
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 6.43
245
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.6
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 6.42
246
Age: 14
Average rating: 67.89
TTFR rankings: 435
Ratio Superior: 6.41
247
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 117.5
TTFR rankings: 751
Ratio Superior: 6.39
248
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.11
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 6.37
249
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.68
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 6.37
250
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.94
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 6.37
251
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.31
TTFR rankings: 478
Ratio Superior: 6.35
252
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 110.93
TTFR rankings: 704
Ratio Superior: 6.35
253
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.54
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 6.34
254
Age: 14
Average rating: 67.89
TTFR rankings: 430
Ratio Superior: 6.33
255
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 101.85
TTFR rankings: 645
Ratio Superior: 6.33
256
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 8.37
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 6.33
257
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.2
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 6.32
258
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 110.93
TTFR rankings: 700
Ratio Superior: 6.31
259
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.53
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 6.23
260
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.94
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 6.22
261
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.4
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 6.2
262
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.09
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 6.19
263
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 171.67
TTFR rankings: 1059
Ratio Superior: 6.17
264
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 8.76
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 6.16
265
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 6.13
266
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.62
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 6.13
267
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 59.46
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 6.12
268
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.61
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 6.12
269
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 124.27
TTFR rankings: 759
Ratio Superior: 6.11
270
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 5.08
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 6.1
271
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.73
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 6.1
272
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.36
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 6.08
273
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 72.24
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 6.06
274
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.94
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 6.06
275
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 77.94
TTFR rankings: 471
Ratio Superior: 6.04
276
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 331.3
TTFR rankings: 2002
Ratio Superior: 6.04
277
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 91.03
TTFR rankings: 549
Ratio Superior: 6.03
278
Age: 16
Average rating: 128.19
TTFR rankings: 772
Ratio Superior: 6.02
279
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 161.96
TTFR rankings: 974
Ratio Superior: 6.01
280
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 5.99
281
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 5.99
282
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 59.46
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 5.97
283
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.33
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 5.96
284
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 298.23
TTFR rankings: 1777
Ratio Superior: 5.96
285
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.53
TTFR rankings: 300
Ratio Superior: 5.94
286
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.3
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 5.93
287
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 5.92
288
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 57.84
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 5.91
289
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.54
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 5.9
290
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 211.52
TTFR rankings: 1245
Ratio Superior: 5.89
291
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.87
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 5.88
292
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 211.52
TTFR rankings: 1239
Ratio Superior: 5.86
293
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 87.8
TTFR rankings: 514
Ratio Superior: 5.85
294
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 152.3
TTFR rankings: 890
Ratio Superior: 5.84
295
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.26
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 5.81
296
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 99.9
TTFR rankings: 578
Ratio Superior: 5.79
297
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.33
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 5.78
298
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.93
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 5.74
299
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.71
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 5.74
300
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.93
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 5.72

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников