The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№201
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.58
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 6.96
№202
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.93
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 6.96
№203
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 110.09
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 6.89
№204
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.81
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 6.88
№205
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.48
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 6.88
№206
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.48
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 6.88
№207
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.8
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 6.88
№208
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.19
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 6.82
№209
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 7.66
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 6.79
№210
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 270.94
TTFR rankings: 1834
Ratio Superior: 6.77
№211
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 6.73
№212
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 104.21
TTFR rankings: 701
Ratio Superior: 6.73
№213
Age: 9
Average rating: 7
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 6.71
№214
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.15
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 6.71
№215
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 98.47
TTFR rankings: 661
Ratio Superior: 6.71
№216
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.22
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 6.69
№217
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 74.15
TTFR rankings: 496
Ratio Superior: 6.69
№218
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.78
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 6.68
№219
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.06
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 6.66
№220
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 6.62
№221
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.5
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 6.62
№222
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.73
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 6.61
№223
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.94
TTFR rankings: 361
Ratio Superior: 6.57
№224
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 9
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 6.56
№225
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.28
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 6.54
№226
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.58
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 6.54
№227
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 6.52
№228
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.37
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 6.51
№229
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.8
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 6.48
№230
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 95.32
TTFR rankings: 618
Ratio Superior: 6.48
№231
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 6.47
№232
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.37
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 6.44
№233
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.39
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 6.43
№234
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 164.91
TTFR rankings: 1059
Ratio Superior: 6.42
№235
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.46
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 6.41
№236
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 100.84
TTFR rankings: 645
Ratio Superior: 6.4
№237
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 110.09
TTFR rankings: 704
Ratio Superior: 6.39
№238
Age: 14
Average rating: 67.47
TTFR rankings: 430
Ratio Superior: 6.37
№239
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79.46
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 6.37
№240
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.48
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 6.36
№241
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 110.09
TTFR rankings: 700
Ratio Superior: 6.36
№242
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.82
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 6.35
№243
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.79
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 6.33
№244
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.98
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 6.31
№245
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 119.05
TTFR rankings: 751
Ratio Superior: 6.31
№246
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.78
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 6.31
№247
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.15
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 6.31
№248
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 68.99
TTFR rankings: 435
Ratio Superior: 6.31
№249
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.99
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 6.3
№250
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.15
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 6.29
№251
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.06
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 6.28
№252
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.28
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№253
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.83
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 6.23
№254
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.85
TTFR rankings: 478
Ratio Superior: 6.22
№255
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.24
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 6.21
№256
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 8.58
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 6.18
№257
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 70.93
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 6.18
№258
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 201.71
TTFR rankings: 1245
Ratio Superior: 6.17
№259
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 123.14
TTFR rankings: 759
Ratio Superior: 6.16
№260
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 201.71
TTFR rankings: 1239
Ratio Superior: 6.14
№261
Age: 13
Average rating: 45.01
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 6.13
№262
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.46
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 6.13
№263
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.56
TTFR rankings: 549
Ratio Superior: 6.13
№264
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№265
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 59.58
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№266
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№267
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.15
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№268
Age: 16
Average rating: 126.39
TTFR rankings: 772
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№269
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79.46
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 6.1
№270
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.92
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 6.05
№271
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 38.86
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 6.05
№272
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 5.17
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 6
№273
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 149.05
TTFR rankings: 890
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№274
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.28
TTFR rankings: 300
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№275
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.71
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 5.96
№276
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 59.58
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 5.96
№277
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 86.57
TTFR rankings: 514
Ratio Superior: 5.94
№278
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79.46
TTFR rankings: 471
Ratio Superior: 5.93
№279
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 300.65
TTFR rankings: 1777
Ratio Superior: 5.91
№280
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 164.91
TTFR rankings: 974
Ratio Superior: 5.91
№281
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 339.2
TTFR rankings: 2002
Ratio Superior: 5.9
№282
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 5.9
№283
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.15
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 5.88
№284
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.73
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 5.88
№285
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 98.47
TTFR rankings: 578
Ratio Superior: 5.87
№286
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.78
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 5.84
№287
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.19
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 5.83
№288
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.55
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 5.82
№289
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 222.53
TTFR rankings: 1292
Ratio Superior: 5.81
№290
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.24
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 5.8
№291
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.72
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 5.77
№292
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 104.21
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 5.76
№293
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.19
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 5.75
№294
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 59.58
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 5.74
№295
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.73
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 5.74
№296
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.28
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 5.73
№297
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.74
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 5.72
№298
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.15
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 5.71
№299
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.46
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 5.71
№300
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.31
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 5.7
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
