A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Drinkhall Paul
Pitchford Liam

Wins: 48

Defeats: 31

Ratio: 1.55

Number of matches: 79

R_max: 27520

R_1,2,3: 22049

R_min: 171

R_1,2,3: 400

Synergistic effect: 0.89

№2

Pair: Drinkhall Paul
Walker Samuel

Wins: 6

Defeats: 14

Ratio: 0.43

Number of matches: 20

R_max: 17698

R_1,2,3: 14580

R_min: 44

R_1,2,3: 2350

Synergistic effect: 0.96

№3

Pair: Drinkhall Paul
Jarvis Tom

Wins: 3

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 8133

R_1,2,3: 3298

R_min: 203

R_1,2,3: 1493

Synergistic effect: 0.73

№4

Pair: Drinkhall Paul
Mcbeath David

Wins: 3

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1.5

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 4017

R_1,2,3: 3862

R_min: 1058

R_1,2,3: 2555

Synergistic effect: 0.88

№5

Pair: Drinkhall Paul
Knight Darius

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 3893

R_1,2,3: 3189

R_min: 3293

R_1,2,3: 3743

Synergistic effect: 1.01

№6

Pair: Drinkhall Paul
Kou Lei

Wins: 4

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 3828

R_1,2,3: 3680

R_min: 3714

R_1,2,3: 3936

Synergistic effect: 1.05

№7

Pair: Baggaley Andrew
Drinkhall Paul

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3018

R_1,2,3: 3228

Synergistic effect: 0.88

№8

Pair: Drinkhall Paul
Rumgay Gavin

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3475

R_1,2,3: 4119

Synergistic effect: 0.86

№9

Pair: Drinkhall Paul
Duda Benedikt

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 431

R_1,2,3: 431

Synergistic effect: 0.43