The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 10.04
TTFR rankings: 460
Ratio Superior: 45.82
№2
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.08
TTFR rankings: 1150
Ratio Superior: 29.43
№3
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.66
TTFR rankings: 1298
Ratio Superior: 28.43
№4
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.07
TTFR rankings: 1390
Ratio Superior: 26.19
№5
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.69
TTFR rankings: 689
Ratio Superior: 25.81
№6
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.33
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 22.75
№7
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.33
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 22.42
№8
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.25
TTFR rankings: 906
Ratio Superior: 21.96
№9
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.97
TTFR rankings: 570
Ratio Superior: 21.95
№10
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.9
TTFR rankings: 462
Ratio Superior: 21.1
№11
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.43
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 20.92
№12
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.6
TTFR rankings: 469
Ratio Superior: 19.87
№13
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.84
TTFR rankings: 832
Ratio Superior: 19.42
№14
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 19.38
№15
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.34
TTFR rankings: 393
Ratio Superior: 19.32
№16
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 366
Ratio Superior: 19.12
№17
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.46
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 18.27
№18
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.34
TTFR rankings: 608
Ratio Superior: 17.71
№19
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.34
TTFR rankings: 359
Ratio Superior: 17.65
№20
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.68
TTFR rankings: 341
Ratio Superior: 17.33
№21
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.69
TTFR rankings: 1331
Ratio Superior: 17.13
№22
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.28
TTFR rankings: 1594
Ratio Superior: 17.09
№23
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.34
TTFR rankings: 579
Ratio Superior: 16.86
№24
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.4
TTFR rankings: 978
Ratio Superior: 16.75
№25
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.37
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 16.72
№26
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.07
TTFR rankings: 887
Ratio Superior: 16.71
№27
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.44
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 16.55
№28
Age: 16
Average rating: 113.07
TTFR rankings: 1861
Ratio Superior: 16.46
№29
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.09
TTFR rankings: 1672
Ratio Superior: 16.22
№30
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.43
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 15.86
№31
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.16
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 15.68
№32
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.73
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 15.38
№33
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.09
TTFR rankings: 1324
Ratio Superior: 15.38
№34
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.45
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 15.31
№35
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.17
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 15.18
№36
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.22
TTFR rankings: 757
Ratio Superior: 15.07
№37
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.34
TTFR rankings: 306
Ratio Superior: 15.04
№38
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.94
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 14.99
№39
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.72
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 14.79
№40
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.73
TTFR rankings: 557
Ratio Superior: 14.76
№41
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.28
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 14.73
№42
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.6
TTFR rankings: 347
Ratio Superior: 14.7
№43
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.9
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 14.52
№44
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.6
TTFR rankings: 339
Ratio Superior: 14.36
№45
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 10.04
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 14.24
№46
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.12
TTFR rankings: 1256
Ratio Superior: 14.09
№47
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.95
TTFR rankings: 1107
Ratio Superior: 14.02
№48
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.04
TTFR rankings: 880
Ratio Superior: 13.96
№49
Age: 8.2
Average rating: 5.76
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 13.89
№50
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.21
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 13.65
№51
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.9
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 13.47
№52
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.73
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 13.35
№53
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.07
TTFR rankings: 986
Ratio Superior: 13.13
№54
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.75
TTFR rankings: 627
Ratio Superior: 13.13
№55
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.17
TTFR rankings: 396
Ratio Superior: 13.13
№56
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.97
TTFR rankings: 338
Ratio Superior: 13.02
№57
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.45
TTFR rankings: 473
Ratio Superior: 12.98
№58
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.73
TTFR rankings: 480
Ratio Superior: 12.72
№59
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.6
TTFR rankings: 293
Ratio Superior: 12.42
№60
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.26
TTFR rankings: 682
Ratio Superior: 12.34
№61
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.28
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 12.3
№62
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.07
TTFR rankings: 648
Ratio Superior: 12.21
№63
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 7.96
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 12.06
№64
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.44
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 11.99
№65
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.69
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 11.91
№66
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.43
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 11.84
№67
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.22
TTFR rankings: 585
Ratio Superior: 11.65
№68
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.06
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 11.64
№69
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.6
TTFR rankings: 966
Ratio Superior: 11.56
№70
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.08
TTFR rankings: 451
Ratio Superior: 11.54
№71
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.16
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 11.54
№72
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.9
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 11.51
№73
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.6
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 11.36
№74
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.21
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 11.33
№75
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.91
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 11.24
№76
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.41
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 11.21
№77
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.59
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 11.21
№78
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.19
TTFR rankings: 777
Ratio Superior: 11.07
№79
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.07
TTFR rankings: 581
Ratio Superior: 10.95
№80
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.53
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 10.93
№81
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.84
TTFR rankings: 465
Ratio Superior: 10.85
№82
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.52
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 10.83
№83
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.59
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 10.83
№84
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.22
TTFR rankings: 542
Ratio Superior: 10.79
№85
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.98
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 10.77
№86
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.07
TTFR rankings: 808
Ratio Superior: 10.76
№87
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 10.76
№88
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 10.17
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 10.72
№89
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.6
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 10.68
№90
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.19
TTFR rankings: 749
Ratio Superior: 10.67
№91
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.09
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 10.65
№92
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.95
TTFR rankings: 840
Ratio Superior: 10.64
№93
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.46
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 10.63
№94
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 155.98
TTFR rankings: 1654
Ratio Superior: 10.6
№95
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.52
TTFR rankings: 299
Ratio Superior: 10.48
№96
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.68
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 10.32
№97
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.6
TTFR rankings: 243
Ratio Superior: 10.3
№98
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.28
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 10.27
№99
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.66
TTFR rankings: 469
Ratio Superior: 10.27
№100
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.28
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 10.08
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
