The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 6.76
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 45.71
№2
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.77
TTFR rankings: 725
Ratio Superior: 31.84
№3
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.13
TTFR rankings: 1239
Ratio Superior: 29.41
№4
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 36.18
TTFR rankings: 1021
Ratio Superior: 28.22
№5
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.77
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 27.52
№6
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.12
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 27.13
№7
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 50.15
TTFR rankings: 1262
Ratio Superior: 25.16
№8
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.75
TTFR rankings: 916
Ratio Superior: 24.26
№9
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.62
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 21.34
№10
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.74
TTFR rankings: 629
Ratio Superior: 21.15
№11
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.62
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 20.73
№12
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 9.28
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 20.47
№13
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.62
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 20.18
№14
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 31.01
TTFR rankings: 620
Ratio Superior: 19.99
№15
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 40.24
TTFR rankings: 801
Ratio Superior: 19.91
№16
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.55
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 19.83
№17
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 32.33
TTFR rankings: 587
Ratio Superior: 18.16
№18
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.65
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 18.08
№19
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.16
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 18.07
№20
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 76.31
TTFR rankings: 1358
Ratio Superior: 17.8
№21
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.09
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 17.78
№22
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.44
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 17.57
№23
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 93.95
TTFR rankings: 1634
Ratio Superior: 17.39
№24
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 17.12
№25
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.06
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 16.83
№26
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.55
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 16.75
№27
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.73
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 16.44
№28
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 50.15
TTFR rankings: 818
Ratio Superior: 16.31
№29
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.62
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 16.09
№30
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.54
TTFR rankings: 907
Ratio Superior: 16.04
№31
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 113.24
TTFR rankings: 1771
Ratio Superior: 15.64
№32
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.24
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 15.39
№33
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.59
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 15.33
№34
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.62
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 15.06
№35
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 104.1
TTFR rankings: 1524
Ratio Superior: 14.64
№36
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.61
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 14.58
№37
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 61.68
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 14.56
№38
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.3
TTFR rankings: 1254
Ratio Superior: 14.53
№39
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.65
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 14.5
№40
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 14.49
№41
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.24
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 14.36
№42
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 64.74
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 13.87
№43
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.94
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 13.78
№44
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.34
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 13.63
№45
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 79.15
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 13.56
№46
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.7
TTFR rankings: 986
Ratio Superior: 13.38
№47
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 89.17
TTFR rankings: 1187
Ratio Superior: 13.31
№48
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.77
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 13.22
№49
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 13.17
№50
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.12
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 13.12
№51
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.89
TTFR rankings: 499
Ratio Superior: 12.83
№52
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.24
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 12.66
№53
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.34
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 12.59
№54
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 12.52
№55
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 12.52
№56
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 12.42
№57
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.94
TTFR rankings: 555
Ratio Superior: 12.35
№58
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 32.33
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 12.31
№59
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 50.15
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 12.16
№60
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.55
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 12.14
№61
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.77
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 12.13
№62
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.61
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 12.11
№63
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.75
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 11.89
№64
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.63
TTFR rankings: 606
Ratio Superior: 11.74
№65
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.99
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 11.71
№66
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.13
TTFR rankings: 484
Ratio Superior: 11.49
№67
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.24
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 11.48
№68
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.76
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 11.43
№69
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.06
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 11.39
№70
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 11.31
№71
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.76
TTFR rankings: 773
Ratio Superior: 11.24
№72
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 7.71
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 11.15
№73
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 7.97
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 11.04
№74
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.77
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 11.04
№75
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.7
TTFR rankings: 808
Ratio Superior: 10.96
№76
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.32
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 10.95
№77
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.62
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 10.94
№78
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 10.92
№79
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 5.65
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№80
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.73
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 10.7
№81
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.3
TTFR rankings: 917
Ratio Superior: 10.63
№82
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 79.15
TTFR rankings: 840
Ratio Superior: 10.61
№83
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.66
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 10.5
№84
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 10.45
№85
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.99
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 10.42
№86
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.56
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 10.42
№87
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.13
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 10.4
№88
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.24
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 10.36
№89
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.94
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 10.32
№90
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.63
TTFR rankings: 533
Ratio Superior: 10.32
№91
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.55
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 10.26
№92
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 157.88
TTFR rankings: 1617
Ratio Superior: 10.24
№93
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.51
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 10.23
№94
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.16
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 10.22
№95
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.58
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 10.19
№96
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.13
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 10.17
№97
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.8
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 10.15
№98
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 36.18
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 10.09
№99
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 61.68
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 10.04
№100
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.99
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 10
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников