The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.05
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 28.37
№2
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.38
TTFR rankings: 503
Ratio Superior: 27.37
№3
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 511
Ratio Superior: 23.69
№4
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 22.6
№5
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.59
TTFR rankings: 710
Ratio Superior: 21.14
№6
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.14
TTFR rankings: 799
Ratio Superior: 20.41
№7
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.19
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 19.74
№8
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.48
TTFR rankings: 441
Ratio Superior: 18.78
№9
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 476
Ratio Superior: 18.52
№10
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 44.98
TTFR rankings: 830
Ratio Superior: 18.45
№11
Age: 13
Average rating: 34.88
TTFR rankings: 640
Ratio Superior: 18.35
№12
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.07
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 18.04
№13
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.61
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 17.26
№14
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.14
TTFR rankings: 670
Ratio Superior: 17.12
№15
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 740
Ratio Superior: 17.05
№16
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 418
Ratio Superior: 16.95
№17
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.07
TTFR rankings: 491
Ratio Superior: 16.89
№18
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.19
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 16.72
№19
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.38
TTFR rankings: 307
Ratio Superior: 16.7
№20
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.35
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 16.38
№21
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.82
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 16.17
№22
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 16.17
№23
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.24
TTFR rankings: 882
Ratio Superior: 15.97
№24
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.66
TTFR rankings: 1212
Ratio Superior: 15.81
№25
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.49
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 15.53
№26
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.57
TTFR rankings: 985
Ratio Superior: 15.25
№27
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.52
TTFR rankings: 412
Ratio Superior: 14.97
№28
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 640
Ratio Superior: 14.75
№29
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.69
TTFR rankings: 850
Ratio Superior: 14.73
№30
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.17
TTFR rankings: 1887
Ratio Superior: 14.61
№31
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.57
TTFR rankings: 387
Ratio Superior: 14.57
№32
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.55
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 14.28
№33
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 36.97
TTFR rankings: 526
Ratio Superior: 14.23
№34
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 36.97
TTFR rankings: 517
Ratio Superior: 13.98
№35
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.35
TTFR rankings: 577
Ratio Superior: 13.95
№36
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.74
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 13.83
№37
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.66
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 13.82
№38
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.26
TTFR rankings: 388
Ratio Superior: 13.73
№39
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.87
TTFR rankings: 720
Ratio Superior: 13.62
№40
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 44.98
TTFR rankings: 604
Ratio Superior: 13.43
№41
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.57
TTFR rankings: 793
Ratio Superior: 13.31
№42
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.88
TTFR rankings: 501
Ratio Superior: 13.23
№43
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 74.02
TTFR rankings: 974
Ratio Superior: 13.16
№44
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.65
TTFR rankings: 410
Ratio Superior: 12.95
№45
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.89
TTFR rankings: 779
Ratio Superior: 12.79
№46
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.57
TTFR rankings: 338
Ratio Superior: 12.72
№47
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.09
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 12.66
№48
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 12.65
№49
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.87
TTFR rankings: 668
Ratio Superior: 12.63
№50
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.05
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 12.49
№51
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.09
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 12.47
№52
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 319
Ratio Superior: 12.41
№53
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.77
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 12.4
№54
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.11
TTFR rankings: 777
Ratio Superior: 12.31
№55
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.11
TTFR rankings: 858
Ratio Superior: 12.24
№56
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 67.5
TTFR rankings: 815
Ratio Superior: 12.07
№57
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.85
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 11.99
№58
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.61
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 11.94
№59
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.68
TTFR rankings: 866
Ratio Superior: 11.92
№60
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.9
TTFR rankings: 546
Ratio Superior: 11.9
№61
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.46
TTFR rankings: 1286
Ratio Superior: 11.86
№62
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.69
TTFR rankings: 599
Ratio Superior: 11.82
№63
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.24
TTFR rankings: 648
Ratio Superior: 11.73
№64
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.07
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 11.7
№65
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.43
TTFR rankings: 1624
Ratio Superior: 11.65
№66
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.61
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 11.6
№67
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 11.59
№68
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.42
TTFR rankings: 1438
Ratio Superior: 11.56
№69
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.17
TTFR rankings: 1028
Ratio Superior: 11.53
№70
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.61
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 11.5
№71
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.17
TTFR rankings: 1024
Ratio Superior: 11.48
№72
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 36.97
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 11.41
№73
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.65
TTFR rankings: 359
Ratio Superior: 11.34
№74
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.26
TTFR rankings: 319
Ratio Superior: 11.29
№75
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.48
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 11.24
№76
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.88
TTFR rankings: 423
Ratio Superior: 11.17
№77
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.68
TTFR rankings: 803
Ratio Superior: 11.05
№78
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.05
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 11.03
№79
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.52
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 10.97
№80
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.07
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 10.91
№81
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.08
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 10.89
№82
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.24
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 10.86
№83
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.17
TTFR rankings: 966
Ratio Superior: 10.83
№84
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.19
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 10.82
№85
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.09
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 10.81
№86
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.9
TTFR rankings: 495
Ratio Superior: 10.78
№87
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.57
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 10.76
№88
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.53
TTFR rankings: 865
Ratio Superior: 10.74
№89
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.55
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 10.74
№90
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.15
TTFR rankings: 515
Ratio Superior: 10.7
№91
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.19
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 10.55
№92
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.31
TTFR rankings: 425
Ratio Superior: 10.54
№93
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 10.48
№94
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.61
TTFR rankings: 341
Ratio Superior: 10.46
№95
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.69
TTFR rankings: 529
Ratio Superior: 10.44
№96
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.57
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 10.41
№97
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 67.5
TTFR rankings: 702
Ratio Superior: 10.4
№98
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.61
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 10.3
№99
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 10.3
№100
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.65
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 10.27
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
