The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.9
TTFR rankings: 681
Ratio Superior: 21.35
№2
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 21.2
№3
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.39
TTFR rankings: 397
Ratio Superior: 20.47
№4
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.1
TTFR rankings: 450
Ratio Superior: 20.36
№5
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.12
TTFR rankings: 737
Ratio Superior: 19.33
№6
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.8
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 18.18
№7
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 24.07
TTFR rankings: 425
Ratio Superior: 17.66
№8
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.18
TTFR rankings: 772
Ratio Superior: 17.47
№9
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 22.1
TTFR rankings: 375
Ratio Superior: 16.97
№10
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 12.56
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 16.8
№11
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.73
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 15.65
№12
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 24.07
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 15.37
№13
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.13
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 15.19
№14
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.51
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 15.13
№15
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.47
TTFR rankings: 597
Ratio Superior: 15.13
№16
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 14.99
№17
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.8
TTFR rankings: 293
Ratio Superior: 14.8
№18
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.02
TTFR rankings: 1148
Ratio Superior: 14.71
№19
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 67.28
TTFR rankings: 987
Ratio Superior: 14.67
№20
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.17
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 14.33
№21
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.48
TTFR rankings: 854
Ratio Superior: 14.12
№22
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.4
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 13.68
№23
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.85
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 13.63
№24
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.4
TTFR rankings: 750
Ratio Superior: 13.54
№25
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.18
TTFR rankings: 595
Ratio Superior: 13.47
№26
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.72
TTFR rankings: 451
Ratio Superior: 13.37
№27
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 14.59
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 13.37
№28
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 132.7
TTFR rankings: 1758
Ratio Superior: 13.25
№29
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.33
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 13.03
№30
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.7
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 12.99
№31
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.99
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 12.62
№32
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.95
TTFR rankings: 463
Ratio Superior: 12.53
№33
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.8
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 12.42
№34
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.48
TTFR rankings: 749
Ratio Superior: 12.38
№35
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.8
TTFR rankings: 652
Ratio Superior: 12.35
№36
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.07
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 12.31
№37
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 23.33
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 12.17
№38
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 42.54
TTFR rankings: 517
Ratio Superior: 12.15
№39
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.31
TTFR rankings: 763
Ratio Superior: 12.05
№40
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 12.01
№41
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 25.1
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 11.99
№42
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.4
TTFR rankings: 659
Ratio Superior: 11.9
№43
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.28
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 11.86
№44
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.47
TTFR rankings: 869
Ratio Superior: 11.67
№45
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.95
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 11.66
№46
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.47
TTFR rankings: 866
Ratio Superior: 11.63
№47
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.68
TTFR rankings: 596
Ratio Superior: 11.53
№48
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.83
TTFR rankings: 467
Ratio Superior: 11.44
№49
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 115.43
TTFR rankings: 1318
Ratio Superior: 11.42
№50
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.13
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 11.36
№51
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.02
TTFR rankings: 884
Ratio Superior: 11.33
№52
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 127
TTFR rankings: 1438
Ratio Superior: 11.32
№53
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.15
TTFR rankings: 789
Ratio Superior: 11.25
№54
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.07
TTFR rankings: 1596
Ratio Superior: 11.23
№55
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.39
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 11.14
№56
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.94
TTFR rankings: 1024
Ratio Superior: 11.14
№57
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.07
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 10.97
№58
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 337
Ratio Superior: 10.89
№59
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.73
TTFR rankings: 299
Ratio Superior: 10.78
№60
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.12
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 10.78
№61
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 10.7
№62
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.79
TTFR rankings: 765
Ratio Superior: 10.66
№63
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.17
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 10.6
№64
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 10.59
№65
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.94
TTFR rankings: 972
Ratio Superior: 10.57
№66
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.31
TTFR rankings: 666
Ratio Superior: 10.52
№67
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.07
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 10.51
№68
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.07
TTFR rankings: 525
Ratio Superior: 10.49
№69
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.68
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 10.38
№70
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.19
TTFR rankings: 705
Ratio Superior: 10.34
№71
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 14.45
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 10.31
№72
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.07
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 10.13
№73
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.85
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 10.12
№74
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.95
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 10.04
№75
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.85
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 9.92
№76
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.23
TTFR rankings: 566
Ratio Superior: 9.89
№77
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.28
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 9.78
№78
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.94
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.77
№79
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.94
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.77
№80
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 102.31
TTFR rankings: 991
Ratio Superior: 9.69
№81
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.56
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 9.66
№82
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.02
TTFR rankings: 752
Ratio Superior: 9.64
№83
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 44.18
TTFR rankings: 424
Ratio Superior: 9.6
№84
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.62
TTFR rankings: 272
Ratio Superior: 9.5
№85
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 67.28
TTFR rankings: 635
Ratio Superior: 9.44
№86
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.68
TTFR rankings: 487
Ratio Superior: 9.42
№87
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 36.95
TTFR rankings: 345
Ratio Superior: 9.34
№88
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.21
TTFR rankings: 1009
Ratio Superior: 9.32
№89
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.91
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 9.32
№90
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.45
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 9.32
№91
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.28
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 9.32
№92
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.85
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 9.31
№93
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.72
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 9.28
№94
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 100.05
TTFR rankings: 928
Ratio Superior: 9.28
№95
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.56
TTFR rankings: 771
Ratio Superior: 9.23
№96
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.44
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 9.22
№97
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 11.67
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 9.17
№98
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.56
TTFR rankings: 445
Ratio Superior: 9.16
№99
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.4
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 9.13
№100
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.3
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 9.11
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников