The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
101
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.75
TTFR rankings: 366
Ratio Superior: 10.24
102
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.03
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 10.18
103
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.49
TTFR rankings: 1043
Ratio Superior: 10.18
104
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.31
TTFR rankings: 409
Ratio Superior: 10.15
105
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.84
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 10.1
106
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.45
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 10.04
107
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.07
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 10.01
108
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.56
TTFR rankings: 684
Ratio Superior: 9.98
109
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.8
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 9.96
110
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.6
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 9.94
111
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.46
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 9.9
112
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 9.81
113
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.25
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 9.73
114
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.56
TTFR rankings: 667
Ratio Superior: 9.73
115
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 11.62
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 9.72
116
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 82.28
TTFR rankings: 796
Ratio Superior: 9.67
117
Age: 15
Average rating: 65.98
TTFR rankings: 635
Ratio Superior: 9.62
118
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.04
TTFR rankings: 404
Ratio Superior: 9.61
119
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.53
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 9.59
120
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 44.98
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 9.58
121
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 96.89
TTFR rankings: 928
Ratio Superior: 9.58
122
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 9.51
123
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.71
TTFR rankings: 727
Ratio Superior: 9.48
124
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.69
TTFR rankings: 941
Ratio Superior: 9.44
125
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.65
TTFR rankings: 561
Ratio Superior: 9.4
126
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.35
TTFR rankings: 865
Ratio Superior: 9.37
127
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.53
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 9.37
128
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.96
TTFR rankings: 532
Ratio Superior: 9.34
129
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.24
TTFR rankings: 729
Ratio Superior: 9.32
130
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.9
TTFR rankings: 426
Ratio Superior: 9.28
131
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.31
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 9.24
132
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.64
TTFR rankings: 1151
Ratio Superior: 9.23
133
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.41
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 9.21
134
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.88
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 9.18
135
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.24
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 9.16
136
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.69
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 9.15
137
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 9.06
138
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.15
TTFR rankings: 436
Ratio Superior: 9.06
139
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.14
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 9.05
140
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.55
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 9.05
141
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.54
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 9.01
142
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.56
TTFR rankings: 617
Ratio Superior: 9
143
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.06
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 8.97
144
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.62
TTFR rankings: 1195
Ratio Superior: 8.94
145
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.06
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 8.91
146
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.54
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 8.84
147
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 113.2
TTFR rankings: 997
Ratio Superior: 8.81
148
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.5
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 8.8
149
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 8.79
150
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.46
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 8.75
151
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.76
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 8.74
152
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.88
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 8.71
153
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.18
TTFR rankings: 550
Ratio Superior: 8.71
154
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.35
TTFR rankings: 801
Ratio Superior: 8.67
155
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.56
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 8.66
156
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 225.79
TTFR rankings: 1944
Ratio Superior: 8.61
157
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.5
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 8.58
158
Age: 15
Average rating: 65.98
TTFR rankings: 562
Ratio Superior: 8.52
159
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.18
TTFR rankings: 538
Ratio Superior: 8.52
160
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.64
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 8.5
161
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.59
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 8.5
162
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.08
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 8.49
163
Age: 15
Average rating: 65.98
TTFR rankings: 560
Ratio Superior: 8.49
164
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.14
TTFR rankings: 330
Ratio Superior: 8.43
165
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.85
TTFR rankings: 890
Ratio Superior: 8.41
166
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.6
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 8.4
167
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 8.39
168
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 194.27
TTFR rankings: 1625
Ratio Superior: 8.36
169
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.35
TTFR rankings: 771
Ratio Superior: 8.35
170
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 8.3
171
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 8.3
172
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.72
TTFR rankings: 387
Ratio Superior: 8.28
173
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.64
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 8.28
174
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.24
TTFR rankings: 457
Ratio Superior: 8.27
175
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 358
Ratio Superior: 8.25
176
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.65
TTFR rankings: 492
Ratio Superior: 8.25
177
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.54
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 8.21
178
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.85
TTFR rankings: 866
Ratio Superior: 8.18
179
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 236.93
TTFR rankings: 1928
Ratio Superior: 8.14
180
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 8.12
181
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.65
TTFR rankings: 484
Ratio Superior: 8.11
182
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.65
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 8.11
183
Age: 9
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 8.09
184
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.48
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 8.09
185
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 7.98
186
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.73
TTFR rankings: 579
Ratio Superior: 7.96
187
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.46
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 7.95
188
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.64
TTFR rankings: 513
Ratio Superior: 7.94
189
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.07
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 7.93
190
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.58
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 7.86
191
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.46
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 7.84
192
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.84
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 7.83
193
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.31
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 7.81
194
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.96
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 7.79
195
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.54
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 7.75
196
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.96
TTFR rankings: 439
Ratio Superior: 7.71
197
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.69
TTFR rankings: 767
Ratio Superior: 7.69
198
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 198.26
TTFR rankings: 1523
Ratio Superior: 7.68
199
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.14
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 7.67
200
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.76
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 7.66

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников