The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
201
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 7.63
202
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.35
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 7.63
203
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.26
TTFR rankings: 420
Ratio Superior: 7.6
204
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.2
TTFR rankings: 479
Ratio Superior: 7.58
205
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.31
TTFR rankings: 305
Ratio Superior: 7.57
206
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.05
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 7.54
207
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 113.19
TTFR rankings: 852
Ratio Superior: 7.53
208
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.54
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 7.5
209
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 7.45
210
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.84
TTFR rankings: 788
Ratio Superior: 7.45
211
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.01
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 7.4
212
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 143.32
TTFR rankings: 1060
Ratio Superior: 7.4
213
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.51
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 7.38
214
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.47
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 7.37
215
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 7.37
216
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.74
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 7.36
217
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 167.93
TTFR rankings: 1233
Ratio Superior: 7.34
218
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.34
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 7.34
219
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.63
TTFR rankings: 1024
Ratio Superior: 7.33
220
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.41
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 7.33
221
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.6
TTFR rankings: 591
Ratio Superior: 7.33
222
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.26
TTFR rankings: 404
Ratio Superior: 7.31
223
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.25
TTFR rankings: 572
Ratio Superior: 7.31
224
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 67.26
TTFR rankings: 491
Ratio Superior: 7.3
225
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.71
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 7.28
226
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.41
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 7.27
227
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 113.19
TTFR rankings: 822
Ratio Superior: 7.26
228
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.77
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 7.22
229
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.65
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 7.22
230
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.31
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 7.21
231
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 82.29
TTFR rankings: 592
Ratio Superior: 7.19
232
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.81
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 7.19
233
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.66
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 7.16
234
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.59
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 7.14
235
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 149.31
TTFR rankings: 1065
Ratio Superior: 7.13
236
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 151.58
TTFR rankings: 1080
Ratio Superior: 7.12
237
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 7.11
238
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.72
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 7.1
239
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.25
TTFR rankings: 554
Ratio Superior: 7.08
240
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.47
TTFR rankings: 633
Ratio Superior: 7.07
241
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.2
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 7.07
242
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.97
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 7.04
243
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.09
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 7.01
244
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.9
TTFR rankings: 1102
Ratio Superior: 6.98
245
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 167.93
TTFR rankings: 1167
Ratio Superior: 6.95
246
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.26
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 6.95
247
Age: 13
Average rating: 34.91
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 6.9
248
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.59
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 6.9
249
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.2
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 6.89
250
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.79
TTFR rankings: 396
Ratio Superior: 6.85
251
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.77
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 6.79
252
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.64
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 6.76
253
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.77
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 6.75
254
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 74.09
TTFR rankings: 500
Ratio Superior: 6.75
255
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.07
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 6.74
256
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 167.93
TTFR rankings: 1126
Ratio Superior: 6.71
257
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 273.77
TTFR rankings: 1832
Ratio Superior: 6.69
258
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.05
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 6.69
259
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.07
TTFR rankings: 527
Ratio Superior: 6.66
260
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.81
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 6.66
261
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 6.65
262
Age: 13
Average rating: 34.91
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 6.65
263
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.72
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 6.64
264
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.54
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 6.61
265
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.87
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 6.6
266
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 6.57
267
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 176.17
TTFR rankings: 1154
Ratio Superior: 6.55
268
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.51
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 6.54
269
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 183.32
TTFR rankings: 1195
Ratio Superior: 6.52
270
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.66
TTFR rankings: 386
Ratio Superior: 6.47
271
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.65
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 6.41
272
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 287.38
TTFR rankings: 1838
Ratio Superior: 6.4
273
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.09
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 6.39
274
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.89
TTFR rankings: 338
Ratio Superior: 6.39
275
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.14
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 6.39
276
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 195.18
TTFR rankings: 1242
Ratio Superior: 6.36
277
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.74
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 6.36
278
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.74
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 6.35
279
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 226.62
TTFR rankings: 1439
Ratio Superior: 6.35
280
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.58
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 6.31
281
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.72
TTFR rankings: 484
Ratio Superior: 6.31
282
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.72
TTFR rankings: 484
Ratio Superior: 6.31
283
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 273.77
TTFR rankings: 1727
Ratio Superior: 6.31
284
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.92
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 6.29
285
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.61
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 6.29
286
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.59
TTFR rankings: 324
Ratio Superior: 6.28
287
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 216.4
TTFR rankings: 1358
Ratio Superior: 6.28
288
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 149.31
TTFR rankings: 936
Ratio Superior: 6.27
289
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.54
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 6.26
290
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.71
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 6.25
291
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 183.32
TTFR rankings: 1144
Ratio Superior: 6.24
292
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.35
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 6.24
293
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.88
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 6.23
294
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.46
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6.22
295
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.71
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 6.21
296
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.88
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 6.2
297
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.27
TTFR rankings: 720
Ratio Superior: 6.19
298
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.31
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 6.18
299
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.07
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 6.17
300
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.65
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 6.17

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников