The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.03
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 28.41
№2
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.36
TTFR rankings: 503
Ratio Superior: 27.4
№3
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.56
TTFR rankings: 511
Ratio Superior: 23.7
№4
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 22.6
№5
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.59
TTFR rankings: 710
Ratio Superior: 21.14
№6
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.14
TTFR rankings: 799
Ratio Superior: 20.41
№7
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.2
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 19.73
№8
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.47
TTFR rankings: 441
Ratio Superior: 18.79
№9
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 476
Ratio Superior: 18.53
№10
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.02
TTFR rankings: 830
Ratio Superior: 18.44
№11
Age: 13
Average rating: 34.91
TTFR rankings: 640
Ratio Superior: 18.33
№12
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.01
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 18.1
№13
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.61
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 17.26
№14
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.14
TTFR rankings: 670
Ratio Superior: 17.12
№15
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 740
Ratio Superior: 17.05
№16
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 418
Ratio Superior: 16.95
№17
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.09
TTFR rankings: 491
Ratio Superior: 16.88
№18
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.36
TTFR rankings: 307
Ratio Superior: 16.72
№19
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.2
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 16.71
№20
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.34
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 16.39
№21
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.81
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 16.18
№22
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 16.17
№23
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.26
TTFR rankings: 882
Ratio Superior: 15.96
№24
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.73
TTFR rankings: 1212
Ratio Superior: 15.8
№25
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.46
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 15.56
№26
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.66
TTFR rankings: 985
Ratio Superior: 15.23
№27
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.51
TTFR rankings: 412
Ratio Superior: 14.98
№28
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.4
TTFR rankings: 640
Ratio Superior: 14.75
№29
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.79
TTFR rankings: 850
Ratio Superior: 14.71
№30
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.4
TTFR rankings: 1887
Ratio Superior: 14.58
№31
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.57
TTFR rankings: 387
Ratio Superior: 14.57
№32
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 14.29
№33
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37
TTFR rankings: 526
Ratio Superior: 14.22
№34
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37
TTFR rankings: 517
Ratio Superior: 13.97
№35
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.35
TTFR rankings: 577
Ratio Superior: 13.95
№36
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.73
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 13.84
№37
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.66
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 13.82
№38
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.26
TTFR rankings: 388
Ratio Superior: 13.73
№39
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.89
TTFR rankings: 720
Ratio Superior: 13.61
№40
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.02
TTFR rankings: 604
Ratio Superior: 13.42
№41
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.66
TTFR rankings: 793
Ratio Superior: 13.29
№42
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.89
TTFR rankings: 501
Ratio Superior: 13.22
№43
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 74.09
TTFR rankings: 974
Ratio Superior: 13.15
№44
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.65
TTFR rankings: 410
Ratio Superior: 12.95
№45
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.98
TTFR rankings: 779
Ratio Superior: 12.77
№46
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.57
TTFR rankings: 338
Ratio Superior: 12.72
№47
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.08
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 12.67
№48
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.66
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 12.65
№49
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.89
TTFR rankings: 668
Ratio Superior: 12.63
№50
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.03
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 12.51
№51
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.08
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 12.48
№52
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 319
Ratio Superior: 12.42
№53
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.77
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 12.4
№54
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.2
TTFR rankings: 777
Ratio Superior: 12.29
№55
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.19
TTFR rankings: 858
Ratio Superior: 12.22
№56
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 67.26
TTFR rankings: 815
Ratio Superior: 12.12
№57
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.84
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 11.99
№58
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.6
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 11.94
№59
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.75
TTFR rankings: 866
Ratio Superior: 11.9
№60
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.92
TTFR rankings: 546
Ratio Superior: 11.89
№61
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.72
TTFR rankings: 1286
Ratio Superior: 11.83
№62
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.71
TTFR rankings: 599
Ratio Superior: 11.81
№63
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.26
TTFR rankings: 648
Ratio Superior: 11.73
№64
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.09
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 11.69
№65
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.65
TTFR rankings: 1624
Ratio Superior: 11.63
№66
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.6
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 11.6
№67
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.56
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 11.6
№68
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.65
TTFR rankings: 1438
Ratio Superior: 11.54
№69
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.6
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 11.5
№70
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.47
TTFR rankings: 1028
Ratio Superior: 11.49
№71
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.47
TTFR rankings: 1024
Ratio Superior: 11.45
№72
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 11.41
№73
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.65
TTFR rankings: 359
Ratio Superior: 11.34
№74
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.26
TTFR rankings: 319
Ratio Superior: 11.29
№75
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.47
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 11.25
№76
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.89
TTFR rankings: 423
Ratio Superior: 11.16
№77
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.03
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 11.04
№78
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.75
TTFR rankings: 803
Ratio Superior: 11.04
№79
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.51
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 10.98
№80
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.01
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 10.94
№81
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.06
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 10.9
№82
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.26
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 10.86
№83
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.08
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 10.82
№84
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.2
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 10.81
№85
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.47
TTFR rankings: 966
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№86
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.92
TTFR rankings: 495
Ratio Superior: 10.78
№87
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.57
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 10.76
№88
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 10.75
№89
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.6
TTFR rankings: 865
Ratio Superior: 10.73
№90
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.17
TTFR rankings: 515
Ratio Superior: 10.69
№91
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.32
TTFR rankings: 425
Ratio Superior: 10.54
№92
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.2
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 10.54
№93
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.56
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 10.48
№94
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.61
TTFR rankings: 341
Ratio Superior: 10.46
№95
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 67.26
TTFR rankings: 702
Ratio Superior: 10.44
№96
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.71
TTFR rankings: 529
Ratio Superior: 10.43
№97
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.59
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 10.41
№98
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.61
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 10.3
№99
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.98
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 10.3
№100
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.65
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 10.27
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников