A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Henzell William
Achanta Sharath Kamal

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 3420

R_1,2,3: 3420

R_min: 3397

R_1,2,3: 3397

Synergistic effect: 0.9

№2

Pair: Henzell William
Powell David

Wins: 2

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.4

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 2016

R_1,2,3: 1790

R_min: 2602

R_1,2,3: 3092

Synergistic effect: 0.89

№3

Pair: Burgis Matiss
Henzell William

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1836

R_1,2,3: 1836

R_min: 3371

R_1,2,3: 3371

Synergistic effect: 0.9

№4

Pair: Carter Trent
Henzell William

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3287

R_1,2,3: 3287

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Frank Robert
Henzell William

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3723

R_1,2,3: 3723

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Henzell William
Flore Tristan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2385

R_1,2,3: 2385

Synergistic effect: 0.69

№7

Pair: Henzell William
Hu Heming

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -