A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Konsbruck Danielle
Meyer Sarah

Wins: 1

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.25

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 4987

R_1,2,3: 4987

R_min: 540

R_1,2,3: 2454

Synergistic effect: 1.43

№2

Pair: Gonderinger Tessy
Konsbruck Danielle

Wins: 3

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 4140

R_1,2,3: 4008

R_min: 3072

R_1,2,3: 4174

Synergistic effect: 1.12

№3

Pair: Konsbruck Danielle
De Nutte Sarah

Wins: 1

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.25

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 3171

R_1,2,3: 3171

R_min: 2685

R_1,2,3: 4361

Synergistic effect: 0.58

№4

Pair: Schlink Vinita
Konsbruck Danielle

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1292

R_1,2,3: 1292

R_min: 3259

R_1,2,3: 3259

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Ni Xia Lian
Konsbruck Danielle

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 8674

R_1,2,3: 8674

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Konsbruck Danielle
Stammet Annick

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3697

R_1,2,3: 3697

Synergistic effect: -