A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Novota Samuel
Kaluzny Samuel

Wins: 4

Defeats: 13

Ratio: 0.31

Number of matches: 17

R_max: 4511

R_1,2,3: 3356

R_min: 235

R_1,2,3: 762

Synergistic effect: 1.24

№2

Pair: Karas David
Novota Samuel

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 2794

R_1,2,3: 2760

R_min: 3264

R_1,2,3: 3672

Synergistic effect: 1.12

№3

Pair: Wang Yang
Novota Samuel

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1598

R_1,2,3: 1598

R_min: 2709

R_1,2,3: 2709

Synergistic effect: 0.71

№4

Pair: Pistej Lubomir
Novota Samuel

Wins: 2

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0.67

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 1508

R_1,2,3: 1317

R_min: 2014

R_1,2,3: 5875

Synergistic effect: 0.48

№5

Pair: Peter Ingemar
Novota Samuel

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 496

R_1,2,3: 496

R_min: 448

R_1,2,3: 448

Synergistic effect: 0.36

№6

Pair: Figel Jakub
Novota Samuel

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 190

R_1,2,3: 190

R_min: 3269

R_1,2,3: 3269

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Novota Samuel
Valuch Alexander

Wins: 0

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3579

R_1,2,3: 5634

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Guman Martin
Novota Samuel

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 461

R_1,2,3: 461

Synergistic effect: 0.41