A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Vite Marlon
Cabrera Adrian

Wins: 27

Defeats: 10

Ratio: 2.7

Number of matches: 37

R_max: 1983

R_1,2,3: 1927

R_min: 903

R_1,2,3: 1219

Synergistic effect: 1.19

№2

Pair: Vite Marlon
Riofrio Emiliano

Wins: 5

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1.25

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 1898

R_1,2,3: 986

R_min: 1888

R_1,2,3: 2120

Synergistic effect: 1.23

№3

Pair: Vite Marlon
Polakof Alen

Wins: 4

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 1479

R_1,2,3: 986

R_min: 1063

R_1,2,3: 1443

Synergistic effect: 1.25

№4

Pair: Shah Aarsh
Vite Marlon

Wins: 3

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 1471

R_1,2,3: 698

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: 1.21

№5

Pair: Vite Marlon
Cordero Camilo

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 1145

R_1,2,3: 573

R_min: 1362

R_1,2,3: 1513

Synergistic effect: 1.56

№6

Pair: Vite Marlon
Zauli Isaac

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1044

R_1,2,3: 1044

R_min: 2277

R_1,2,3: 2277

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Aulestia Ian
Vite Marlon

Wins: 1

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 349

R_1,2,3: 349

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Vite Marlon
Vite Marlon

Wins: 1

Defeats: 0

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3:

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Vite Marlon
Hesselgren Johan

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 1902

R_1,2,3: 1902

Synergistic effect: -