A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Zhan Jian
Chen Feng

Wins: 4

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 4118

R_1,2,3: 3740

R_min: 4108

R_1,2,3: 4129

Synergistic effect: 0.96

№2

Pair: Ma Liang
Chen Feng

Wins: 4

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 3972

R_1,2,3: 3201

R_min: 4020

R_1,2,3: 4151

Synergistic effect: 1.14

№3

Pair: Han Liunisi
Chen Feng

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 3951

R_1,2,3: 3951

R_min: 5325

R_1,2,3: 5325

Synergistic effect: 1.14

№4

Pair: Chen Feng
Xin Zhaoxu

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 3889

R_1,2,3: 3889

R_min: 4654

R_1,2,3: 4654

Synergistic effect: 1.11

№5

Pair: Yang Zi
Chen Feng

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 3856

R_1,2,3: 3545

R_min: 4549

R_1,2,3: 4560

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Pang Xue Jie
Chen Feng

Wins: 10

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 15

R_max: 3738

R_1,2,3: 3676

R_min: 2704

R_1,2,3: 3654

Synergistic effect: 1.03

№7

Pair: Chen Feng
Wu Zhikang

Wins: 6

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 1.2

Number of matches: 11

R_max: 3557

R_1,2,3: 3232

R_min: 4108

R_1,2,3: 4236

Synergistic effect: 1.06

№8

Pair: Li Hu
Chen Feng

Wins: 5

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 0.83

Number of matches: 11

R_max: 3467

R_1,2,3: 3332

R_min: 3641

R_1,2,3: 3913

Synergistic effect: 0.91

№9

Pair: Chew Zhe Yu Clarence
Chen Feng

Wins: 2

Defeats: 8

Ratio: 0.25

Number of matches: 10

R_max: 2821

R_1,2,3: 2684

R_min: 3708

R_1,2,3: 3752

Synergistic effect: -