A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Soderlund Simon
Dilling Andreas

Wins: 4

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 4

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 2339

R_1,2,3: 1967

R_min: 2106

R_1,2,3: 2106

Synergistic effect: 0.84

№2

Pair: Dilling Andreas
Mikkelsen Rasmus

Wins: 16

Defeats: 12

Ratio: 1.33

Number of matches: 28

R_max: 2332

R_1,2,3: 2118

R_min: 433

R_1,2,3: 1014

Synergistic effect: 1.01

№3

Pair: Dilling Andreas
Andersen Martin Buch

Wins: 4

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1.33

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 2008

R_1,2,3: 1466

R_min: 2201

R_1,2,3: 2380

Synergistic effect: 1.36

№4

Pair: Lind Anders
Dilling Andreas

Wins: 3

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 1685

R_1,2,3: 861

R_min: 602

R_1,2,3: 1658

Synergistic effect: 0.64

№5

Pair: Hansen Jakob
Dilling Andreas

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 1310

R_1,2,3: 944

R_min: 1461

R_1,2,3: 1561

Synergistic effect: 1.32

№6

Pair: Dilling Andreas
Rasmussen Kasper

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1293

R_1,2,3: 1293

R_min: 2864

R_1,2,3: 2864

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: De Voss Nicolai
Dilling Andreas

Wins: 7

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 1.4

Number of matches: 12

R_max: 1221

R_1,2,3: 962

R_min: 517

R_1,2,3: 959

Synergistic effect: 0.9

№8

Pair: Smid Stellan
Dilling Andreas

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2662

R_1,2,3: 2662

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Dilling Andreas
Savill Luke

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1228

R_1,2,3: 1228

Synergistic effect: 0.54