A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Zetterstrom Helena
Egeholt Sofie

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2567

R_1,2,3: 2567

R_min: 3547

R_1,2,3: 3547

Synergistic effect: 1.31

№2

Pair: Egeholt Sofie
Koefoed Nicoline

Wins: 2

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 2186

R_1,2,3: 1912

R_min: 1020

R_1,2,3: 2114

Synergistic effect: 1.05

№3

Pair: Egeholt Sofie
Tuslova Veronika

Wins: 2

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0.67

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 857

R_1,2,3: 429

R_min: 857

R_1,2,3: 1535

Synergistic effect: 0.56

№4

Pair: Eriksson Pihla
Egeholt Sofie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2549

R_1,2,3: 2549

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Singeorzan Arina
Egeholt Sofie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2339

R_1,2,3: 2339

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Egeholt Sofie
Van Boheemen Vera

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3515

R_1,2,3: 3515

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Egeholt Sofie
Jakobsen Louise

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2513

R_1,2,3: 2513

Synergistic effect: -