A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Mekamporn Nawin
Sanglertsilpachai Thyme

Wins: 11

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 1.83

Number of matches: 17

R_max: 2272

R_1,2,3: 1102

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 842

Synergistic effect: 1.27

№2

Pair: Sanglertsilpachai Thyme
Chanpen Chetthanabodi

Wins: 3

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.6

Number of matches: 8

R_max: 862

R_1,2,3: 461

R_min: 1341

R_1,2,3: 1420

Synergistic effect: -

№3

Pair: Sanglertsilpachai Thyme
Israeli Tal

Wins: 4

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 637

R_1,2,3: 212

R_min: 1046

R_1,2,3: 1181

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Surakasamsavat Puttipong
Sanglertsilpachai Thyme

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 740

R_1,2,3: 1412

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Sanglertsilpachai Thyme
Tantakool Tananan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 16

R_1,2,3: 7460

Synergistic effect: 0.04

№6

Pair: Sanglertsilpachai Thyme
Gubran Ebrahim

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 240

R_1,2,3: 240

Synergistic effect: 0.36

№7

Pair: Sanglertsilpachai Thyme
Wongthosarat Sirapat

Wins: 1

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.25

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 240

R_1,2,3: 1210

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Sanglertsilpachai Thyme
Nuchchart Sitisak

Wins: 1

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.25

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 1086

R_1,2,3: 1127

Synergistic effect: -