A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Lindso Daniel
Torngren Hugo

Wins: 3

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1.5

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 663

R_1,2,3: 221

R_min: 16

R_1,2,3: 28

Synergistic effect: -

№2

Pair: Lindso Daniel
Tauler Norbert

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 275

R_1,2,3: 275

R_min: 70

R_1,2,3: 70

Synergistic effect: 0.64

№3

Pair: Lindso Daniel
Lundqvist Elliot

Wins: 3

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 230

R_1,2,3: 77

R_min: 464

R_1,2,3: 553

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Gomes Goncalo
Lindso Daniel

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 56

R_1,2,3: 56

R_min: 89

R_1,2,3: 89

Synergistic effect: 8

№5

Pair: Friis Martin
Lindso Daniel

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 2

R_1,2,3: 2

R_min: 10

R_1,2,3: 10

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Lindso Daniel
Pukk Oskar

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 20

R_1,2,3: 20

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Lindso Daniel
Widing Charlie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 6

R_1,2,3: 6

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Abrahamsson Theo
Lindso Daniel

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 571

R_1,2,3: 988

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Lindso Daniel
Hedbom Max

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 260

R_1,2,3: 480

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Lindso Daniel
Sahle Carl

Wins: 4

Defeats: 9

Ratio: 0.44

Number of matches: 13

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -