A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Smith James
Walsh Ethan

Wins: 11

Defeats: 9

Ratio: 1.22

Number of matches: 20

R_max: 1769

R_1,2,3: 989

R_min: 220

R_1,2,3: 317

Synergistic effect: 1.27

№2

Pair: Walsh Ethan
Cope Joseph

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 801

R_1,2,3: 801

R_min: 285

R_1,2,3: 477

Synergistic effect: 1.11

№3

Pair: Kortchinski Ilia
Walsh Ethan

Wins: 1

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0.33

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 498

R_1,2,3: 498

R_min: 837

R_1,2,3: 1435

Synergistic effect: 0.77

№4

Pair: Dai Harry
Walsh Ethan

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 481

R_1,2,3: 160

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: 0.55

№5

Pair: Walsh Ethan
Kases Andre Pierre

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 8

R_1,2,3: 8

R_min: 540

R_1,2,3: 540

Synergistic effect: 0.54

№6

Pair: Walsh Ethan
Liu Jamie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 3

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 697

R_1,2,3: 1021

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Chesterman Samuel
Walsh Ethan

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 330

R_1,2,3: 330

Synergistic effect: 0.67