A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

Player
Country
Category
Time
- 2024


Pair
Wins
Defeats
Ratio
Number of matches
Rmax
R1,2,3
Rmin
R1,2,3
Synergistic effect
1
Wins: 2
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 2
Number of matches: 3
Rmax: 2319
R1,2,3: 1160
Rmin: 3312
R1,2,3: 3312
Synergistic effect: 1.04
2
Wins: 12
Defeats: 5
Ratio: 2.4
Number of matches: 17
Rmax: 2157
R1,2,3: 1917
Rmin: 0
R1,2,3: 703
Synergistic effect: 0.72
3
Wins: 24
Defeats: 14
Ratio: 1.71
Number of matches: 38
Rmax: 2064
R1,2,3: 1384
Rmin: 0
R1,2,3: 0
Synergistic effect: 0.58
4
Wins: 1
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 1
Number of matches: 2
Rmax: 2003
R1,2,3: 2003
Rmin: 1952
R1,2,3: 1952
Synergistic effect: 0.87
5
Wins: 2
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 2
Number of matches: 3
Rmax: 1870
R1,2,3: 935
Rmin: 1696
R1,2,3: 1696
Synergistic effect: 1.4
6
Wins: 4
Defeats: 7
Ratio: 0.57
Number of matches: 11
Rmax: 931
R1,2,3: 560
Rmin: 0
R1,2,3: 370
Synergistic effect: 0.43
7
Wins: 3
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 3
Number of matches: 4
Rmax: 388
R1,2,3: 183
Rmin: 280
R1,2,3: 280
Synergistic effect: 0.2
8
Wins: 3
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 3
Number of matches: 4
Rmax: 37
R1,2,3: 13
Rmin: 111
R1,2,3: 111
Synergistic effect: -
9
Wins: 1
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 1
Number of matches: 2
Rmax: 24
R1,2,3: 24
Rmin: 57
R1,2,3: 57
Synergistic effect: -
10
Wins: 3
Defeats: 2
Ratio: 1.5
Number of matches: 5
Rmax: 0
R1,2,3: 0
Rmin: 1128
R1,2,3: 1206
Synergistic effect: 0.95