A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Rosca Mihai
Blanariu Dionisie

Wins: 4

Defeats: 8

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 12

R_max: 949

R_1,2,3: 530

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 83

Synergistic effect: 1.28

№2

Pair: Chirita Iulian
Rosca Mihai

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 860

R_1,2,3: 860

R_min: 1420

R_1,2,3: 1420

Synergistic effect: 1.73

№3

Pair: Rosca Mihai
Movileanu Darius

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 857

R_1,2,3: 469

R_min: 697

R_1,2,3: 697

Synergistic effect: 1.44

№4

Pair: Rosca Mihai
Ionescu Eduard

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 481

R_1,2,3: 241

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: 0.97

№5

Pair: Cocinschi Emanuel
Rosca Mihai

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 455

R_1,2,3: 385

R_min: 1600

R_1,2,3: 1791

Synergistic effect: 1.56

№6

Pair: Rosca Mihai
Culpedin Emir

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 415

R_1,2,3: 415

R_min: 651

R_1,2,3: 651

Synergistic effect: 1.68

№7

Pair: Oroszlan Richard-Lorand
Rosca Mihai

Wins: 1

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.2

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 412

R_1,2,3: 412

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 412

Synergistic effect: 0.48

№8

Pair: Rosca Mihai
Bujor Dragos

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 362

R_1,2,3: 362

R_min: 669

R_1,2,3: 699

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Petrov Martin
Rosca Mihai

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1150

R_1,2,3: 1150

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Rosca Mihai
Deschamps Hugo

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1172

R_1,2,3: 1172

Synergistic effect: -

№11

Pair: Pop Mihai
Rosca Mihai

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 600

R_1,2,3: 600

Synergistic effect: 0.71

№12

Pair: Rosca Mihai
Van Dessel Mael

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 129

R_1,2,3: 129

Synergistic effect: 0.51