A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Hursey Anna
Earley Sophie

Wins: 17

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 4.25

Number of matches: 21

R_max: 951

R_1,2,3: 838

R_min: 111

R_1,2,3: 467

Synergistic effect: 12.54

№2

Pair: Earley Sophie
Heinen Silke

Wins: 7

Defeats: 7

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 14

R_max: 183

R_1,2,3: 101

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -

№3

Pair: Earley Sophie
Coll Silvia

Wins: 3

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 3

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 1

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 20

R_1,2,3: 20

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Papadimitriou Malamatenia
Earley Sophie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 111

R_1,2,3: 111

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: O'rahilly Egan Mia
Earley Sophie

Wins: 0

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 1432

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Earley Sophie
Pinto Matilde

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Earley Sophie
Ragi Pravesha

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 330

R_1,2,3: 330

Synergistic effect: -

№8

Pair: Earley Sophie
Scott Nicole

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 528

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Earley Sophie
Peters Anna

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Earley Sophie
Rogove Millie

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -

№11

Pair: Earley Sophie
De Stoppeleire Clea

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 65

Synergistic effect: -

№12

Pair: Earley Sophie
Singh Anjali

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 0

Synergistic effect: -