The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
2101
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.74
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2102
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.87
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2103
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.76
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2104
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.76
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2105
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.82
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2106
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2107
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.07
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2108
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.62
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2109
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 172.15
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2110
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2111
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2112
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.56
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2113
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.87
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2114
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.07
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2115
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.07
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2116
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.14
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2117
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.81
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2118
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.46
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2119
Age: 19.4
Average rating: 256.17
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2120
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.62
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2121
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.62
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2122
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.14
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2123
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.44
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2124
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.74
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2125
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.6
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2126
Age: 20.7
Average rating: 376.7
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2127
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.32
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2128
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.24
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2129
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.91
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2130
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 10.09
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2131
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.98
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2132
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.98
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2133
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.43
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2134
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.43
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2135
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.67
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2136
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.56
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2137
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2138
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2139
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.74
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2140
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.08
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2141
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.62
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2142
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.06
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2143
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.06
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2144
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.07
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2145
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.07
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2146
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 177.15
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2147
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.32
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2148
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 107.83
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2149
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.36
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2150
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.36
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2151
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.91
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2152
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.74
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2153
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.46
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2154
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.44
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2155
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12.01
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2156
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.62
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2157
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.62
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2158
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.07
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2159
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.73
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2160
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.9
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2161
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 9.08
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2162
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.74
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2163
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.32
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2164
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2165
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.44
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2166
Age: 20.7
Average rating: 376.7
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2167
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.08
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2168
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.62
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2169
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.44
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2170
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.32
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2171
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.32
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2172
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.37
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2173
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.37
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2174
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.61
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2175
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.18
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2176
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 177.15
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2177
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.12
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2178
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.89
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2179
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.89
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2180
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.75
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2181
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2182
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2183
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.03
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2184
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 257.31
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2185
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.35
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2186
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.52
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2187
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.84
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2188
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.66
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2189
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.76
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2190
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 138.17
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2191
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.72
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2192
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.36
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2193
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.61
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2194
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.92
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2195
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.75
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2196
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.07
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2197
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.06
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2198
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.26
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2199
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.62
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2200
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.32
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.62

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников