The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
2301
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.3
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2302
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.7
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2303
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.17
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2304
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.17
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2305
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.63
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2306
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 215.08
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2307
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.69
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2308
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.17
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2309
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 257.22
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2310
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 162.53
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 0.54
2311
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.24
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2312
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.05
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2313
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.38
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2314
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.03
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2315
Age: 17
Average rating: 149.68
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2316
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 263.49
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2317
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.44
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2318
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.44
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2319
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.44
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2320
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 72.08
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2321
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.57
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2322
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.64
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.53
2323
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.53
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2324
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.35
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2325
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.71
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2326
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.71
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2327
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.21
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2328
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.21
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2329
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.39
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2330
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.48
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2331
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.55
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2332
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.89
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.52
2333
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.7
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2334
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 185.58
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2335
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.13
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2336
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2337
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2338
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.74
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2339
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.74
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2340
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.74
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2341
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.51
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2342
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.51
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2343
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.51
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2344
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.31
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2345
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 5.94
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.51
2346
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.48
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2347
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.48
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2348
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.71
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2349
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 169.17
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2350
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 72.08
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2351
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 184.6
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2352
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 257.05
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2353
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.07
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2354
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.39
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2355
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 10.08
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.5
2356
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.26
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2357
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.78
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2358
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2359
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 200.68
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2360
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.35
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2361
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.35
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2362
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.35
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2363
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.35
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2364
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 10.22
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2365
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 10.22
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2366
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 10.22
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2367
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.64
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2368
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.61
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2369
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.89
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2370
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.89
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2371
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.49
2372
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.16
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2373
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.53
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2374
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2375
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.43
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2376
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.69
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2377
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.05
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2378
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.65
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2379
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.51
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2380
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.81
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.48
2381
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.07
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.47
2382
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.06
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.47
2383
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.6
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.47
2384
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.03
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.47
2385
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.28
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 0.47
2386
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.48
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.47
2387
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.44
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.47
2388
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 172.12
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2389
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.23
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2390
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.89
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2391
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.97
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2392
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.97
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2393
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.97
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2394
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.7
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2395
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 6.54
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2396
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.89
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2397
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.31
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.46
2398
Age: 17
Average rating: 149.68
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.45
2399
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.65
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 0.45
2400
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.33
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.45

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников