The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1001
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.25
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№1002
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.07
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№1003
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 165.44
TTFR rankings: 419
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1004
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.03
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1005
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.42
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1006
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.29
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1007
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.44
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1008
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.86
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1009
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.63
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1010
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.88
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1011
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.09
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1012
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.62
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1013
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.2
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1014
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.94
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1015
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.61
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№1016
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 6.77
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№1017
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.63
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№1018
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.07
TTFR rankings: 271
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№1019
Age: 20.5
Average rating: 369.44
TTFR rankings: 926
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№1020
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 162.52
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№1021
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.79
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№1022
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.4
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.5
№1023
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.85
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№1024
Age: 12
Average rating: 26.07
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.49
№1025
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.59
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№1026
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.25
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№1027
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 184.63
TTFR rankings: 458
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№1028
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.98
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№1029
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.03
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№1030
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.47
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№1031
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.47
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 2.48
№1032
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.23
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№1033
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.92
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№1034
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.1
TTFR rankings: 282
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№1035
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.81
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№1036
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.81
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 2.47
№1037
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.21
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№1038
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.94
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№1039
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.9
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№1040
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.45
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№1041
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.18
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.46
№1042
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.41
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№1043
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.78
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№1044
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.2
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№1045
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 179.65
TTFR rankings: 440
Ratio Superior: 2.45
№1046
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.82
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№1047
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 6.59
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№1048
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.09
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 2.43
№1049
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 72.03
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 2.42
№1050
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.61
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.41
№1051
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.96
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 2.4
№1052
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.63
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 2.4
№1053
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 194.06
TTFR rankings: 465
Ratio Superior: 2.4
№1054
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 288.95
TTFR rankings: 692
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№1055
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.25
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№1056
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.74
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 2.39
№1057
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.32
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№1058
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.23
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№1059
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.22
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№1060
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.5
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№1061
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.62
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№1062
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.42
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№1063
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.42
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.38
№1064
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.91
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№1065
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.59
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№1066
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 72.03
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№1067
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 199.73
TTFR rankings: 474
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№1068
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№1069
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.41
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.37
№1070
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.78
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№1071
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.35
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№1072
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.29
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№1073
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.09
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№1074
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.59
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 2.36
№1075
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.63
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№1076
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.52
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№1077
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.78
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№1078
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.91
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№1079
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.16
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№1080
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.31
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.35
№1081
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.63
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 2.34
№1082
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.42
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№1083
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.47
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№1084
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.85
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№1085
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.32
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.33
№1086
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.79
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№1087
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.85
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 2.32
№1088
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.81
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№1089
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.41
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 2.31
№1090
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 165.44
TTFR rankings: 381
Ratio Superior: 2.3
№1091
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.75
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1092
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.47
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1093
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 300.54
TTFR rankings: 689
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1094
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 199.73
TTFR rankings: 457
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1095
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 160.84
TTFR rankings: 368
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1096
Age: 19
Average rating: 238.73
TTFR rankings: 546
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1097
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.4
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1098
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.18
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.29
№1099
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.1
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 2.28
№1100
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.41
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 2.28
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
