The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
901
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 2.78
902
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.6
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 2.78
903
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.93
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 2.78
904
Age: 17
Average rating: 148.75
TTFR rankings: 413
Ratio Superior: 2.78
905
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.91
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 2.78
906
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.98
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 2.77
907
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 120.45
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 2.76
908
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.6
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 2.76
909
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.76
910
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.37
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 2.76
911
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.92
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 2.75
912
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.75
913
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.19
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 2.75
914
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.56
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 2.75
915
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 236.52
TTFR rankings: 650
Ratio Superior: 2.75
916
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.73
TTFR rankings: 219
Ratio Superior: 2.75
917
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 288.81
TTFR rankings: 792
Ratio Superior: 2.74
918
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 154.08
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 2.74
919
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.56
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 2.74
920
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.59
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 2.73
921
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.69
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.73
922
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.37
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.73
923
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 120.45
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 2.73
924
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.38
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.72
925
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.55
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.72
926
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 401.43
TTFR rankings: 1091
Ratio Superior: 2.72
927
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 236.52
TTFR rankings: 642
Ratio Superior: 2.71
928
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.6
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 2.71
929
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.81
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 2.71
930
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.21
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 2.71
931
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.01
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.71
932
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 2.7
933
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 6.66
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 2.7
934
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.14
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.7
935
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.26
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.7
936
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.61
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.69
937
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.11
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 2.69
938
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.6
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 2.69
939
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.74
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 2.69
940
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.78
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 2.69
941
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.98
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 2.68
942
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 183.05
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 2.68
943
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.68
944
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.02
TTFR rankings: 337
Ratio Superior: 2.67
945
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.11
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 2.67
946
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.45
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.67
947
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.45
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.67
948
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.23
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 2.67
949
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.75
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 2.67
950
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.75
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 2.67
951
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 2.67
952
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.89
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.66
953
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.93
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.66
954
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.21
TTFR rankings: 261
Ratio Superior: 2.66
955
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.3
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.66
956
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.57
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.66
957
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 199.54
TTFR rankings: 530
Ratio Superior: 2.66
958
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 117.99
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 2.65
959
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.26
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.65
960
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 2.65
961
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 2.65
962
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.65
963
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.18
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 2.65
964
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.88
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 2.65
965
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.82
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.64
966
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.57
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 2.64
967
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.1
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.64
968
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.19
TTFR rankings: 327
Ratio Superior: 2.63
969
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.92
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 2.63
970
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 2.62
971
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 211.93
TTFR rankings: 554
Ratio Superior: 2.61
972
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.39
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 2.61
973
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.39
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 2.61
974
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 72
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.61
975
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.02
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 2.61
976
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.06
TTFR rankings: 282
Ratio Superior: 2.61
977
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.2
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 2.61
978
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.21
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 2.61
979
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.03
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.61
980
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.59
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 2.6
981
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.72
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.6
982
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.79
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.6
983
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.59
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 2.6
984
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.6
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 2.6
985
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.07
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 2.59
986
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 6.94
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 2.59
987
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.82
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.59
988
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.14
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.59
989
Age: 18
Average rating: 184.34
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 2.59
990
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.38
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 2.59
991
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.74
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 2.58
992
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.02
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 2.57
993
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.2
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 2.57
994
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.06
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 2.56
995
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.88
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 2.56
996
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 7.83
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 2.55
997
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.92
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.55
998
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.11
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 2.55
999
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.38
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 2.55
1000
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.34
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.55

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников