The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
801
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 3.08
802
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.83
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 3.08
803
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.81
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 3.08
804
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.02
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 3.07
805
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.16
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 3.07
806
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.16
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 3.07
807
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 3.07
808
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 3.06
809
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.59
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 3.06
810
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.12
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 3.06
811
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.07
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 3.06
812
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.11
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 3.05
813
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.82
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 3.05
814
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.98
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.05
815
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.98
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.05
816
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 3.05
817
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 3.05
818
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 175.73
TTFR rankings: 535
Ratio Superior: 3.04
819
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 391.3
TTFR rankings: 1191
Ratio Superior: 3.04
820
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.08
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 3.03
821
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.55
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 3.03
822
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.69
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 3.02
823
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.69
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 3.02
824
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.45
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 3.02
825
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 201.16
TTFR rankings: 607
Ratio Superior: 3.02
826
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.96
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 3.01
827
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.69
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 3.01
828
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.81
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.01
829
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.27
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 3.01
830
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 3.01
831
Age: 20.5
Average rating: 369.35
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 3.01
832
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 3
833
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.1
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 2.99
834
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 2.99
835
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.78
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.98
836
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.66
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 2.98
837
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 2.97
838
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.81
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 2.97
839
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.81
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 2.97
840
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.55
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 2.97
841
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.3
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.97
842
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.12
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 2.96
843
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.96
844
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.96
845
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.69
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 2.96
846
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.94
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 2.95
847
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.92
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 2.94
848
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.88
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.94
849
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.94
850
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.33
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 2.93
851
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.36
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.93
852
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.93
853
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.75
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.93
854
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.93
855
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.12
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 2.93
856
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.69
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 2.93
857
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.92
858
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.82
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 2.92
859
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 179.48
TTFR rankings: 522
Ratio Superior: 2.91
860
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.75
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 2.91
861
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.39
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 2.9
862
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.59
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.9
863
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.11
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.89
864
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.93
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.89
865
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.01
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.88
866
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.11
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 2.87
867
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.71
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.87
868
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.83
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 2.87
869
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.08
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 2.87
870
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.36
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.87
871
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.08
TTFR rankings: 402
Ratio Superior: 2.87
872
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.02
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 2.87
873
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.48
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.87
874
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 391.3
TTFR rankings: 1119
Ratio Superior: 2.86
875
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.86
876
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.86
877
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.11
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 2.85
878
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.78
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.85
879
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.78
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.85
880
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.43
TTFR rankings: 255
Ratio Superior: 2.85
881
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.77
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 2.84
882
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.77
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 2.84
883
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.27
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.84
884
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 170.6
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 2.84
885
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.98
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 2.84
886
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.69
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 2.84
887
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.43
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 2.84
888
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 342.58
TTFR rankings: 968
Ratio Superior: 2.83
889
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.66
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 2.81
890
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 201.16
TTFR rankings: 566
Ratio Superior: 2.81
891
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.77
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 2.81
892
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.4
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.8
893
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.37
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 2.8
894
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.53
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.8
895
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.94
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 2.79
896
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.02
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 2.79
897
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.82
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 2.79
898
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.13
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 2.79
899
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.54
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 2.78
900
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.69
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 2.78

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников