The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
701
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.42
702
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.81
TTFR rankings: 266
Ratio Superior: 3.42
703
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 3.42
704
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.91
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 3.41
705
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.12
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 3.39
706
Age: 20.7
Average rating: 375.88
TTFR rankings: 1272
Ratio Superior: 3.38
707
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.37
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 3.38
708
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.66
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 3.38
709
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.13
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 3.37
710
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 5.94
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 3.37
711
Age: 8.1
Average rating: 5.05
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 3.37
712
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 170.61
TTFR rankings: 574
Ratio Superior: 3.36
713
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.3
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.36
714
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.36
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 3.36
715
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.08
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 3.36
716
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.29
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 3.36
717
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 9.84
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 3.35
718
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 175.65
TTFR rankings: 589
Ratio Superior: 3.35
719
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.12
TTFR rankings: 386
Ratio Superior: 3.35
720
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.71
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 3.35
721
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.83
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 3.35
722
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.15
TTFR rankings: 382
Ratio Superior: 3.35
723
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.97
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 3.34
724
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.76
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 3.34
725
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.76
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 3.34
726
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.1
TTFR rankings: 467
Ratio Superior: 3.33
727
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 342.59
TTFR rankings: 1141
Ratio Superior: 3.33
728
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.15
TTFR rankings: 380
Ratio Superior: 3.33
729
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.52
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 3.32
730
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.39
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 3.31
731
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.43
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 3.31
732
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.81
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 3.3
733
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.71
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.29
734
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.55
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.29
735
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.12
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 3.28
736
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.93
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 3.28
737
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.73
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 3.28
738
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.73
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 3.28
739
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.7
TTFR rankings: 212
Ratio Superior: 3.28
740
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 206.55
TTFR rankings: 676
Ratio Superior: 3.27
741
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.98
TTFR rankings: 481
Ratio Superior: 3.27
742
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 3.27
743
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.27
744
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 175.65
TTFR rankings: 572
Ratio Superior: 3.26
745
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.73
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 3.24
746
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.39
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.24
747
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.73
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 3.23
748
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.78
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.23
749
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.3
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 3.23
750
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.1
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 3.23
751
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.12
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 3.22
752
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.55
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 3.22
753
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.61
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 3.22
754
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.7
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 3.21
755
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 3.21
756
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.13
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 3.21
757
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.3
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 3.21
758
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 179.5
TTFR rankings: 576
Ratio Superior: 3.21
759
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.43
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 3.2
760
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.32
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 3.2
761
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.2
762
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.2
763
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 206.55
TTFR rankings: 660
Ratio Superior: 3.2
764
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.5
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 3.19
765
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 3.19
766
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.37
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 3.19
767
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.86
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 3.18
768
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 162.35
TTFR rankings: 516
Ratio Superior: 3.18
769
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 3.17
770
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.51
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 3.17
771
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.32
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 3.17
772
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.93
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 3.17
773
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.58
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.17
774
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.8
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 3.16
775
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.95
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 3.16
776
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.92
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 3.16
777
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.15
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 3.15
778
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.15
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 3.15
779
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.55
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 3.15
780
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 179.5
TTFR rankings: 566
Ratio Superior: 3.15
781
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.33
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 3.15
782
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.29
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 3.15
783
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.73
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 3.15
784
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 193.93
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 3.15
785
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.84
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 3.14
786
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.34
TTFR rankings: 287
Ratio Superior: 3.14
787
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 3.14
788
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.47
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 3.14
789
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.08
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 3.13
790
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.05
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 3.12
791
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.5
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 3.12
792
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 165.95
TTFR rankings: 517
Ratio Superior: 3.12
793
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.77
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 3.11
794
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.52
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 3.11
795
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.93
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 3.11
796
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 3.11
797
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.11
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.1
798
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.98
TTFR rankings: 455
Ratio Superior: 3.1
799
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.13
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 3.09
800
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.73
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 3.09

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников