The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№601
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 270.86
TTFR rankings: 1055
Ratio Superior: 3.9
№602
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.97
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 3.89
№603
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.1
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 3.88
№604
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.6
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 3.88
№605
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.42
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 3.87
№606
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 132.41
TTFR rankings: 511
Ratio Superior: 3.86
№607
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.69
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 3.85
№608
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.11
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 3.84
№609
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 7.82
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 3.84
№610
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.1
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 3.83
№611
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.23
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 3.83
№612
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.6
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 3.83
№613
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.07
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 3.82
№614
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.72
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 3.82
№615
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.69
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 3.82
№616
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 253.88
TTFR rankings: 968
Ratio Superior: 3.81
№617
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.55
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 3.81
№618
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.34
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 3.8
№619
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.54
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 3.8
№620
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.77
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№621
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.69
TTFR rankings: 245
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№622
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.69
TTFR rankings: 245
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№623
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№624
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.8
TTFR rankings: 377
Ratio Superior: 3.78
№625
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.77
№626
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.77
№627
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.34
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 3.77
№628
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 398.68
TTFR rankings: 1501
Ratio Superior: 3.76
№629
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 3.75
№630
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.8
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 3.73
№631
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 182.9
TTFR rankings: 679
Ratio Superior: 3.71
№632
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.1
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 3.71
№633
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.51
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 3.7
№634
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.97
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 3.7
№635
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.3
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 3.69
№636
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.99
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 3.68
№637
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.12
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 3.68
№638
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 120.56
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 3.67
№639
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.72
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 3.67
№640
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.75
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 3.66
№641
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.07
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 3.66
№642
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.48
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 3.66
№643
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.42
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.65
№644
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.42
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.65
№645
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.66
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 3.65
№646
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№647
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.02
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№648
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.44
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№649
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.15
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№650
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.8
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№651
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 256.65
TTFR rankings: 931
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№652
Age: 16
Average rating: 112.78
TTFR rankings: 409
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№653
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.6
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 3.62
№654
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.34
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 3.62
№655
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.76
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 3.61
№656
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.07
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 3.59
№657
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.31
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 3.59
№658
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.34
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№659
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.34
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№660
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.02
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№661
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.02
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№662
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№663
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№664
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№665
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.43
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.58
№666
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.83
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 3.57
№667
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.86
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 3.56
№668
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 137.58
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 3.56
№669
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.07
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 3.55
№670
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.99
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.55
№671
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.1
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№672
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.1
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№673
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№674
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.72
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№675
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.83
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№676
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.81
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№677
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.49
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№678
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.14
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№679
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.75
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№680
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№681
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.29
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.5
№682
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.44
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.5
№683
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.88
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.49
№684
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.8
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№685
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.55
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№686
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.91
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№687
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 223.72
TTFR rankings: 779
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№688
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.38
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№689
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.99
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№690
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.99
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№691
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 175.41
TTFR rankings: 609
Ratio Superior: 3.47
№692
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 6.63
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 3.47
№693
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.72
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.47
№694
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.28
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 3.46
№695
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.38
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 3.46
№696
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.76
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№697
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.1
TTFR rankings: 406
Ratio Superior: 3.44
№698
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.38
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№699
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.11
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 3.42
№700
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.75
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 3.42
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
