The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
501
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.02
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 4.41
502
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.13
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 4.4
503
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 178.88
TTFR rankings: 786
Ratio Superior: 4.39
504
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 4.38
505
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.1
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 4.38
506
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.76
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 4.37
507
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.48
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 4.37
508
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 4.37
509
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.8
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 4.37
510
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.31
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 4.36
511
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 4.36
512
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.3
TTFR rankings: 397
Ratio Superior: 4.35
513
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.1
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 4.35
514
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.9
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 4.34
515
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.58
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 4.32
516
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.27
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 4.32
517
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.72
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 4.31
518
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 139.61
TTFR rankings: 601
Ratio Superior: 4.3
519
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 343.47
TTFR rankings: 1477
Ratio Superior: 4.3
520
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 4.3
521
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.82
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 4.3
522
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.25
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 4.29
523
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.47
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 4.29
524
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 4.28
525
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 280.54
TTFR rankings: 1199
Ratio Superior: 4.27
526
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.11
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 4.27
527
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 4.26
528
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.76
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 4.26
529
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 4.25
530
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 4.25
531
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 161.91
TTFR rankings: 688
Ratio Superior: 4.25
532
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.14
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 4.24
533
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.76
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 4.23
534
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.51
TTFR rankings: 366
Ratio Superior: 4.23
535
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.11
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 4.22
536
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.31
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 4.21
537
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.07
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 4.2
538
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 137.08
TTFR rankings: 576
Ratio Superior: 4.2
539
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.72
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 4.19
540
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.1
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 4.19
541
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.36
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 4.18
542
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 137.08
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 4.18
543
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 9.84
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 4.17
544
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.65
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 4.16
545
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.47
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 4.16
546
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 4.16
547
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.55
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 4.16
548
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.41
TTFR rankings: 262
Ratio Superior: 4.13
549
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.29
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 4.13
550
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 4.13
551
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 280.54
TTFR rankings: 1157
Ratio Superior: 4.12
552
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.48
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 4.11
553
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.52
TTFR rankings: 343
Ratio Superior: 4.11
554
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 4.1
555
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 4.1
556
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 137.08
TTFR rankings: 562
Ratio Superior: 4.1
557
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.65
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 4.1
558
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.79
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 4.1
559
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.35
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 4.1
560
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 224.6
TTFR rankings: 919
Ratio Superior: 4.09
561
Age: 17
Average rating: 148.38
TTFR rankings: 607
Ratio Superior: 4.09
562
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 4.08
563
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 346.05
TTFR rankings: 1408
Ratio Superior: 4.07
564
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.51
TTFR rankings: 596
Ratio Superior: 4.07
565
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.1
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 4.05
566
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.76
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 4.05
567
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.09
TTFR rankings: 437
Ratio Superior: 4.04
568
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 165.59
TTFR rankings: 669
Ratio Superior: 4.04
569
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.25
TTFR rankings: 417
Ratio Superior: 4.04
570
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.31
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 4.03
571
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.31
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 4.03
572
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 153.71
TTFR rankings: 620
Ratio Superior: 4.03
573
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 4.02
574
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.47
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 4.02
575
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.27
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 4.01
576
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.41
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 4.01
577
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.25
TTFR rankings: 413
Ratio Superior: 4
578
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 4
579
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 4
580
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 4
581
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 4
582
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.11
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 3.99
583
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.51
TTFR rankings: 584
Ratio Superior: 3.99
584
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.36
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 3.99
585
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 3.98
586
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.63
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 3.98
587
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.13
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 3.97
588
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.01
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 3.96
589
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.82
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 3.96
590
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.97
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 3.96
591
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.88
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 3.95
592
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.31
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 3.95
593
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.48
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 3.95
594
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.1
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 3.94
595
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.97
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 3.93
596
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.97
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 3.93
597
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.52
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 3.93
598
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.07
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 3.92
599
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.07
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 3.92
600
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.11
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 3.91

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников