The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№401
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.8
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 5.14
№402
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 125.94
TTFR rankings: 646
Ratio Superior: 5.13
№403
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.94
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 5.13
№404
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.94
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 5.13
№405
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.74
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 5.1
№406
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 325.57
TTFR rankings: 1661
Ratio Superior: 5.1
№407
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.75
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 5.09
№408
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.33
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 5.09
№409
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.78
TTFR rankings: 476
Ratio Superior: 5.08
№410
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 5.06
№411
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 342.8
TTFR rankings: 1734
Ratio Superior: 5.06
№412
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.49
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 5.05
№413
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.34
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 5.04
№414
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 5.04
№415
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.9
TTFR rankings: 412
Ratio Superior: 5.03
№416
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 5.02
№417
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.06
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 5.01
№418
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 262.87
TTFR rankings: 1316
Ratio Superior: 5.01
№419
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 5
№420
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.7
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 4.98
№421
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.38
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 4.97
№422
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.78
TTFR rankings: 465
Ratio Superior: 4.96
№423
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.9
TTFR rankings: 405
Ratio Superior: 4.95
№424
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 325.57
TTFR rankings: 1609
Ratio Superior: 4.94
№425
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.88
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 4.94
№426
Age: 16
Average rating: 112.57
TTFR rankings: 555
Ratio Superior: 4.93
№427
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.75
TTFR rankings: 491
Ratio Superior: 4.92
№428
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.75
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 4.92
№429
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.05
TTFR rankings: 481
Ratio Superior: 4.91
№430
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.12
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 4.9
№431
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.34
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 4.88
№432
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.64
TTFR rankings: 569
Ratio Superior: 4.88
№433
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.65
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 4.88
№434
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.05
TTFR rankings: 477
Ratio Superior: 4.86
№435
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 4.85
№436
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.96
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 4.85
№437
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 4.85
№438
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.39
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 4.84
№439
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 223.73
TTFR rankings: 1082
Ratio Superior: 4.84
№440
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.7
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 4.83
№441
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.08
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 4.83
№442
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 164.71
TTFR rankings: 793
Ratio Superior: 4.81
№443
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.75
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 4.81
№444
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.09
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 4.81
№445
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.03
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 4.79
№446
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.75
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 4.79
№447
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 169.83
TTFR rankings: 813
Ratio Superior: 4.79
№448
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.43
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 4.78
№449
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.78
TTFR rankings: 448
Ratio Superior: 4.78
№450
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.73
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 4.78
№451
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.05
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 4.77
№452
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.03
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 4.75
№453
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 169.83
TTFR rankings: 807
Ratio Superior: 4.75
№454
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.06
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 4.75
№455
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 4.74
№456
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 182.4
TTFR rankings: 861
Ratio Superior: 4.72
№457
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.11
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 4.72
№458
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 5.94
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 4.71
№459
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.04
TTFR rankings: 282
Ratio Superior: 4.7
№460
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.06
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 4.69
№461
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 217.37
TTFR rankings: 1016
Ratio Superior: 4.67
№462
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 4.67
№463
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.29
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 4.67
№464
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 4.65
№465
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 4.65
№466
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.05
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 4.64
№467
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 174.88
TTFR rankings: 810
Ratio Superior: 4.63
№468
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.45
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 4.63
№469
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.94
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 4.63
№470
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 4.61
№471
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.24
TTFR rankings: 347
Ratio Superior: 4.61
№472
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 4.61
№473
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.76
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 4.61
№474
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.05
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 4.6
№475
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 4.58
№476
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 230.89
TTFR rankings: 1055
Ratio Superior: 4.57
№477
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.85
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 4.57
№478
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.34
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 4.56
№479
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.44
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 4.56
№480
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.32
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 4.54
№481
Age: 20.4
Average rating: 360.26
TTFR rankings: 1635
Ratio Superior: 4.54
№482
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.7
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 4.53
№483
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.42
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 4.53
№484
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 4.52
№485
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 193.26
TTFR rankings: 870
Ratio Superior: 4.5
№486
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 4.49
№487
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.8
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 4.49
№488
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.05
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 4.47
№489
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.65
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 4.47
№490
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.05
TTFR rankings: 437
Ratio Superior: 4.46
№491
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.24
TTFR rankings: 335
Ratio Superior: 4.45
№492
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.64
TTFR rankings: 519
Ratio Superior: 4.45
№493
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.56
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 4.43
№494
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.62
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 4.43
№495
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.26
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 4.42
№496
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.24
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 4.41
№497
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.85
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 4.41
№498
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 4.41
№499
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 4.41
№500
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.61
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 4.41
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
