The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№301
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.85
TTFR rankings: 569
Ratio Superior: 6.06
№302
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.98
TTFR rankings: 497
Ratio Superior: 6.06
№303
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.04
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 6.03
№304
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 120.4
TTFR rankings: 722
Ratio Superior: 6
№305
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.55
TTFR rankings: 519
Ratio Superior: 6
№306
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.04
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 5.99
№307
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.34
TTFR rankings: 547
Ratio Superior: 5.99
№308
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.2
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 5.98
№309
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№310
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.33
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№311
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.81
TTFR rankings: 476
Ratio Superior: 5.96
№312
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.27
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 5.96
№313
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.73
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 5.93
№314
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.11
TTFR rankings: 581
Ratio Superior: 5.92
№315
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 160.1
TTFR rankings: 948
Ratio Superior: 5.92
№316
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 5.9
№317
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 5.9
№318
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.88
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 5.9
№319
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.3
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 5.87
№320
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.93
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 5.86
№321
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 213.96
TTFR rankings: 1249
Ratio Superior: 5.84
№322
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.78
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 5.83
№323
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.44
TTFR rankings: 521
Ratio Superior: 5.83
№324
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.43
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 5.82
№325
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.31
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 5.82
№326
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.26
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 5.81
№327
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.06
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 5.81
№328
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.71
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.8
№329
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.2
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 5.8
№330
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 5.8
№331
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.41
TTFR rankings: 628
Ratio Superior: 5.79
№332
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.11
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 5.77
№333
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.47
TTFR rankings: 366
Ratio Superior: 5.77
№334
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.56
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 5.75
№335
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.88
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 5.75
№336
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 5.72
№337
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.13
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 5.72
№338
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.47
TTFR rankings: 363
Ratio Superior: 5.72
№339
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.93
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 5.71
№340
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 174.9
TTFR rankings: 999
Ratio Superior: 5.71
№341
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 153.59
TTFR rankings: 875
Ratio Superior: 5.7
№342
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.09
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 5.69
№343
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 5.68
№344
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.74
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 5.67
№345
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 130.89
TTFR rankings: 740
Ratio Superior: 5.65
№346
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.3
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 5.64
№347
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 5.63
№348
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.33
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 5.54
№349
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.79
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 5.54
№350
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 5.53
№351
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 300.7
TTFR rankings: 1662
Ratio Superior: 5.53
№352
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.06
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 5.51
№353
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.85
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 5.5
№354
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.77
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 5.48
№355
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.69
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 5.47
№356
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.87
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 5.47
№357
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.45
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№358
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.41
TTFR rankings: 592
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№359
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.04
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№360
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.05
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 5.45
№361
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.73
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 5.45
№362
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.15
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 5.43
№363
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.31
TTFR rankings: 300
Ratio Superior: 5.42
№364
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.7
TTFR rankings: 349
Ratio Superior: 5.39
№365
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.04
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 5.39
№366
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.55
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 5.39
№367
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 182.43
TTFR rankings: 983
Ratio Superior: 5.39
№368
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 183.89
TTFR rankings: 989
Ratio Superior: 5.38
№369
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.85
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 5.37
№370
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.49
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 5.36
№371
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.49
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 5.36
№372
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.34
TTFR rankings: 488
Ratio Superior: 5.34
№373
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.11
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 5.34
№374
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.98
TTFR rankings: 437
Ratio Superior: 5.33
№375
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.79
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 5.33
№376
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.39
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 5.32
№377
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.31
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 5.31
№378
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.33
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 5.3
№379
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.05
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 5.29
№380
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.39
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 5.29
№381
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.87
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 5.29
№382
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.69
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 5.26
№383
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 5.25
№384
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 136.96
TTFR rankings: 716
Ratio Superior: 5.23
№385
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 279.78
TTFR rankings: 1459
Ratio Superior: 5.21
№386
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.06
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 5.2
№387
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 6.54
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 5.2
№388
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 9.81
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 5.2
№389
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 289.11
TTFR rankings: 1502
Ratio Superior: 5.2
№390
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.15
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 5.19
№391
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.39
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 5.19
№392
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.79
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 5.19
№393
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.13
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 5.18
№394
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.64
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 5.18
№395
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.88
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 5.17
№396
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.32
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 5.16
№397
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 136.96
TTFR rankings: 707
Ratio Superior: 5.16
№398
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.33
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 5.15
№399
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 5.15
№400
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 5.15
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников