The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№201
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 84.18
TTFR rankings: 633
Ratio Superior: 7.52
№202
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 8.39
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 7.51
№203
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 10.17
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 7.47
№204
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 70.01
TTFR rankings: 523
Ratio Superior: 7.47
№205
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.97
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 7.46
№206
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.01
TTFR rankings: 380
Ratio Superior: 7.45
№207
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 19.66
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 7.43
№208
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 11.88
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 7.41
№209
Age: 14
Average rating: 66.16
TTFR rankings: 488
Ratio Superior: 7.38
№210
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.8
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 7.34
№211
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.04
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 7.34
№212
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.28
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 7.33
№213
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 15.18
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 7.31
№214
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.06
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 7.29
№215
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 61.94
TTFR rankings: 451
Ratio Superior: 7.28
№216
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 79.87
TTFR rankings: 581
Ratio Superior: 7.27
№217
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 111.72
TTFR rankings: 812
Ratio Superior: 7.27
№218
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.2
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 7.27
№219
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 10.62
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 7.25
№220
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.45
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 7.25
№221
Age: 10
Average rating: 9.95
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 7.24
№222
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.27
TTFR rankings: 219
Ratio Superior: 7.23
№223
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 16.31
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 7.23
№224
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 89.82
TTFR rankings: 649
Ratio Superior: 7.23
№225
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.56
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 7.21
№226
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 7.91
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 7.21
№227
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.93
TTFR rankings: 374
Ratio Superior: 7.2
№228
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 70.01
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 7.2
№229
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 105.39
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 7.19
№230
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.97
TTFR rankings: 388
Ratio Superior: 7.19
№231
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 101.46
TTFR rankings: 728
Ratio Superior: 7.18
№232
Age: 7.8
Average rating: 2.65
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 7.17
№233
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.02
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 7.14
№234
Age: 10
Average rating: 9.95
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 7.14
№235
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.23
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 7.11
№236
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.97
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 7.1
№237
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 58.76
TTFR rankings: 414
Ratio Superior: 7.05
№238
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 7.6
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 6.97
№239
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.56
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 6.94
№240
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.12
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 6.92
№241
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 101.46
TTFR rankings: 701
Ratio Superior: 6.91
№242
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.45
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 6.89
№243
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 72.67
TTFR rankings: 496
Ratio Superior: 6.83
№244
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 53.97
TTFR rankings: 368
Ratio Superior: 6.82
№245
Age: 12
Average rating: 27.45
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 6.78
№246
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.69
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 6.77
№247
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.32
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 6.75
№248
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 272.76
TTFR rankings: 1841
Ratio Superior: 6.75
№249
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 17.2
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 6.74
№250
Age: 10
Average rating: 9.95
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 6.73
№251
Age: 8.1
Average rating: 3.13
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 6.71
№252
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 6.41
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 6.71
№253
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.23
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 6.7
№254
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.04
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 6.7
№255
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 10.62
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 6.69
№256
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 98.95
TTFR rankings: 661
Ratio Superior: 6.68
№257
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 8.39
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 6.67
№258
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 8.39
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 6.67
№259
Age: 11
Average rating: 15.59
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 6.67
№260
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.8
TTFR rankings: 272
Ratio Superior: 6.67
№261
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.69
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 6.63
№262
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.04
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 6.62
№263
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 11.66
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 6.6
№264
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 93.88
TTFR rankings: 618
Ratio Superior: 6.58
№265
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 48.52
TTFR rankings: 319
Ratio Superior: 6.57
№266
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 98.95
TTFR rankings: 645
Ratio Superior: 6.52
№267
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 77.8
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 6.5
№268
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 163.09
TTFR rankings: 1059
Ratio Superior: 6.49
№269
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.04
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 6.48
№270
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.28
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 6.47
№271
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 55.91
TTFR rankings: 361
Ratio Superior: 6.46
№272
Age: 16
Average rating: 121.8
TTFR rankings: 786
Ratio Superior: 6.45
№273
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.69
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 6.44
№274
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 67.66
TTFR rankings: 435
Ratio Superior: 6.43
№275
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.18
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 6.43
№276
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 14.04
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6.41
№277
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 67.66
TTFR rankings: 433
Ratio Superior: 6.4
№278
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.43
TTFR rankings: 481
Ratio Superior: 6.38
№279
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 8.94
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 6.38
№280
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 67.66
TTFR rankings: 430
Ratio Superior: 6.36
№281
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 119.43
TTFR rankings: 759
Ratio Superior: 6.36
№282
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 116.09
TTFR rankings: 737
Ratio Superior: 6.35
№283
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.8
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 6.33
№284
Age: 13
Average rating: 43.9
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 6.29
№285
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.06
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 6.25
№286
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.79
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 6.25
№287
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 48.52
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 6.24
№288
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 17.78
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 6.24
№289
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 77.8
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 6.23
№290
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.39
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 6.23
№291
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.39
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 6.23
№292
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.41
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 6.2
№293
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 58.76
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 6.19
№294
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 224.23
TTFR rankings: 1388
Ratio Superior: 6.19
№295
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 51.01
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 6.18
№296
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 144.36
TTFR rankings: 890
Ratio Superior: 6.17
№297
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 201.01
TTFR rankings: 1239
Ratio Superior: 6.16
№298
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 207.07
TTFR rankings: 1275
Ratio Superior: 6.16
№299
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 58.76
TTFR rankings: 361
Ratio Superior: 6.14
№300
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 26.06
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 6.14
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников