The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
201
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.31
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 7.44
202
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.01
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 7.41
203
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 253.55
TTFR rankings: 1877
Ratio Superior: 7.4
204
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 7.38
205
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.1
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 7.38
206
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.7
TTFR rankings: 337
Ratio Superior: 7.37
207
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.5
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 7.36
208
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.5
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 7.36
209
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.28
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 7.35
210
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.44
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 7.35
211
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.69
TTFR rankings: 510
Ratio Superior: 7.32
212
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.42
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 7.31
213
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.53
TTFR rankings: 486
Ratio Superior: 7.3
214
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.34
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 7.3
215
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.82
TTFR rankings: 568
Ratio Superior: 7.3
216
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.48
TTFR rankings: 462
Ratio Superior: 7.28
217
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.02
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 7.22
218
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.7
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 7.2
219
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.1
TTFR rankings: 245
Ratio Superior: 7.18
220
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.45
TTFR rankings: 642
Ratio Superior: 7.18
221
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.42
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 7.13
222
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.82
TTFR rankings: 554
Ratio Superior: 7.12
223
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.27
TTFR rankings: 735
Ratio Superior: 7.12
224
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 52.97
TTFR rankings: 377
Ratio Superior: 7.12
225
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.8
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 7.1
226
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 153.6
TTFR rankings: 1087
Ratio Superior: 7.08
227
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.39
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 7.04
228
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.3
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 7.04
229
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.32
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 7.03
230
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.33
TTFR rankings: 388
Ratio Superior: 7.01
231
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.39
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 7.01
232
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.33
TTFR rankings: 528
Ratio Superior: 7.01
233
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.71
TTFR rankings: 229
Ratio Superior: 7
234
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.74
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 6.99
235
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.78
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 6.97
236
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.33
TTFR rankings: 385
Ratio Superior: 6.96
237
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.44
TTFR rankings: 378
Ratio Superior: 6.94
238
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.46
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 6.94
239
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 243
Ratio Superior: 6.92
240
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 114.97
TTFR rankings: 794
Ratio Superior: 6.91
241
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.12
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 6.89
242
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.64
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 6.87
243
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.42
TTFR rankings: 738
Ratio Superior: 6.81
244
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.89
TTFR rankings: 385
Ratio Superior: 6.77
245
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.31
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6.76
246
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 8.01
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 6.74
247
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 52.97
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 6.74
248
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.39
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 6.73
249
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.06
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 6.72
250
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.15
TTFR rankings: 404
Ratio Superior: 6.72
251
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.69
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 6.72
252
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.34
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 6.71
253
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.81
TTFR rankings: 641
Ratio Superior: 6.69
254
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.53
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 6.68
255
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.06
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 6.66
256
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.5
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 6.64
257
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.03
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 6.63
258
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 52.97
TTFR rankings: 351
Ratio Superior: 6.63
259
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.12
TTFR rankings: 650
Ratio Superior: 6.62
260
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 160.11
TTFR rankings: 1059
Ratio Superior: 6.61
261
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.57
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 6.61
262
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.16
TTFR rankings: 450
Ratio Superior: 6.6
263
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.53
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 6.52
264
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 6.75
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 6.52
265
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 193.29
TTFR rankings: 1259
Ratio Superior: 6.51
266
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 52.97
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 6.49
267
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.91
TTFR rankings: 645
Ratio Superior: 6.46
268
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.89
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 6.45
269
Age: 20
Average rating: 314.55
TTFR rankings: 2028
Ratio Superior: 6.45
270
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 193.29
TTFR rankings: 1243
Ratio Superior: 6.43
271
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.76
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 6.37
272
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.27
TTFR rankings: 656
Ratio Superior: 6.35
273
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.97
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 6.35
274
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.35
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 6.35
275
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.93
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 6.32
276
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 279.47
TTFR rankings: 1759
Ratio Superior: 6.29
277
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.57
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 6.29
278
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.14
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 6.28
279
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.89
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 6.28
280
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.89
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 6.28
281
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.33
TTFR rankings: 472
Ratio Superior: 6.27
282
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.28
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 6.23
283
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.14
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 6.23
284
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.76
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 6.22
285
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 6.22
286
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.15
TTFR rankings: 771
Ratio Superior: 6.21
287
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.42
TTFR rankings: 672
Ratio Superior: 6.2
288
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 213.56
TTFR rankings: 1319
Ratio Superior: 6.18
289
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.14
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 6.17
290
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 262.56
TTFR rankings: 1618
Ratio Superior: 6.16
291
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.53
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 6.16
292
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.64
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 6.16
293
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.94
TTFR rankings: 442
Ratio Superior: 6.14
294
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.45
TTFR rankings: 549
Ratio Superior: 6.14
295
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 216.99
TTFR rankings: 1329
Ratio Superior: 6.12
296
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.13
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 6.12
297
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.14
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 6.12
298
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 52.97
TTFR rankings: 324
Ratio Superior: 6.12
299
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.39
TTFR rankings: 890
Ratio Superior: 6.08
300
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.82
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 6.08

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников