The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1301
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1302
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.06
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1303
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 179.39
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1304
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 179.39
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1305
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.74
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1306
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.84
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1307
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.74
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1308
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.69
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1309
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.69
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1310
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 139.96
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1311
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.32
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1312
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 327.12
TTFR rankings: 596
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1313
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1314
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.72
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1315
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 257.47
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1316
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.69
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1317
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1318
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1319
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.81
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1320
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.77
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1321
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.39
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1322
Age: 20
Average rating: 316.44
TTFR rankings: 571
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1323
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.57
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1324
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.43
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1325
Age: 16
Average rating: 112.21
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1326
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.35
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1327
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.81
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1328
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.94
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1329
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.48
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1330
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 302.37
TTFR rankings: 541
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1331
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.37
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1332
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.15
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1333
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1334
Age: 16
Average rating: 112.21
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1335
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.41
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1336
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.41
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1337
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 125.98
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1338
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.94
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1339
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.69
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1340
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.08
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1341
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.45
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1342
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 120.03
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1343
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 238.97
TTFR rankings: 424
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1344
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.45
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1345
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.69
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1346
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.57
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1347
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.77
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1348
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1349
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1350
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 10.24
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1351
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.45
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1352
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.45
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1353
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.85
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1354
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.48
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1355
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.36
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1356
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.39
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1357
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.45
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1358
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.16
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1359
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.41
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1360
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.3
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1361
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.68
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1362
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.61
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1363
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.1
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1364
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 170.5
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1365
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.16
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1366
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.63
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1367
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.84
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1368
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.06
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1369
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.15
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1370
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.81
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1371
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.27
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1372
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 114.7
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1373
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.45
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1374
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.69
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1375
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.52
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1376
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 264.69
TTFR rankings: 456
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1377
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.37
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1378
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 215.79
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1379
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.4
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1380
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.36
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1381
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.75
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1382
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.3
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1383
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.3
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1384
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1385
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.48
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1386
Age: 19
Average rating: 240.97
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1387
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.4
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1388
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.16
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1389
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.22
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1390
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 120.03
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1391
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.72
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1392
Age: 17
Average rating: 148.71
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1393
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.37
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1394
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.08
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1395
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1396
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.79
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1397
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.95
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1398
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.77
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1399
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1400
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 137.44
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 1.68

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников