The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1301
Age: 10
Average rating: 9.22
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1302
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.09
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1303
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 33.18
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1304
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.76
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1305
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.85
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1306
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.12
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.84
1307
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 11.99
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1308
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.49
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1309
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 139.56
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1310
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.61
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.83
1311
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.76
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1312
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.64
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1313
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 6.59
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1314
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 37.96
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1315
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 16.51
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1316
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.17
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1317
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 111.24
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 1.82
1318
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.46
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1319
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.09
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1320
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 65.1
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1321
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 181.76
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1322
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.15
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1323
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 8.29
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1324
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.98
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 1.81
1325
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 7.76
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1326
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 111.24
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1327
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.05
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 1.8
1328
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.97
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1329
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.49
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1330
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.42
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1331
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 37.96
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1332
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.15
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1333
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.12
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1334
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.62
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1335
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.63
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1336
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.5
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.79
1337
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 33.18
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1338
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.76
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1339
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.34
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1340
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.46
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.78
1341
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 14.09
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1342
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 10.71
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1343
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.52
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1344
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.98
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1345
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.15
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1346
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.62
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.77
1347
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 73.68
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1348
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 146.36
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1349
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 41.99
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1350
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.58
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1351
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 10.22
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1352
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 102.38
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1353
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.97
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1354
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 16.51
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1355
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 16.51
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1356
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 30.76
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.76
1357
Age: 20.1
Average rating: 338.82
TTFR rankings: 594
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1358
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.76
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1359
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.5
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1360
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.09
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1361
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 73.68
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1362
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 73.68
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1363
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.05
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1364
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.17
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1365
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 33.18
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1366
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 62.38
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.75
1367
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 9.77
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1368
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 41.99
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1369
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 40.84
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1370
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.16
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1371
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 85.29
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.74
1372
Age: 11
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1373
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 62.38
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1374
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 62.38
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1375
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 17.93
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1376
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 330.82
TTFR rankings: 571
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1377
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 119.39
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 1.73
1378
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.61
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1379
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.61
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1380
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 20.92
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1381
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 20.92
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1382
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 31.98
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1383
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.84
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1384
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 76.33
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 1.72
1385
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 216.72
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1386
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 240.1
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1387
Age: 16
Average rating: 112.83
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1388
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 3.51
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1389
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 3.51
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1390
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 173.17
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 1.71
1391
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 317.37
TTFR rankings: 541
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1392
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.85
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1393
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.46
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1394
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 62.38
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1395
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 136.23
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 1.7
1396
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 87.98
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1397
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.61
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1398
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 148.89
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1399
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 31.98
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1400
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 238.09
TTFR rankings: 402
Ratio Superior: 1.69

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников