The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1401
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.01
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.69
1402
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 119.37
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1403
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1404
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.65
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1405
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.17
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1406
Age: 14
Average rating: 59.01
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1407
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1408
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1409
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 15.51
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1410
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 7.76
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1411
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 7.76
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1412
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.88
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.68
1413
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.7
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1414
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.84
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1415
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.04
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1416
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 6.59
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1417
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 182.32
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1418
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 4.2
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 1.67
1419
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.64
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1420
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 195.22
TTFR rankings: 325
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1421
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 231.5
TTFR rankings: 385
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1422
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 262.29
TTFR rankings: 436
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1423
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.17
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.66
1424
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.14
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1425
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.84
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1426
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.54
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.65
1427
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.64
1428
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.64
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.64
1429
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.08
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 1.64
1430
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.14
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.63
1431
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.2
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.63
1432
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 62.44
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.63
1433
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.88
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.63
1434
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 37.99
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.63
1435
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 13.49
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.63
1436
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 14.12
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.63
1437
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.11
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.62
1438
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 19.14
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.62
1439
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.65
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.61
1440
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.84
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.61
1441
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.84
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.61
1442
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 73.74
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.61
1443
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.82
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.61
1444
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.14
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.61
1445
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 85.27
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 1.61
1446
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.61
1447
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.75
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.6
1448
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.37
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.6
1449
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 73.74
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.6
1450
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.13
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 1.6
1451
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.01
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.59
1452
Age: 14
Average rating: 59.01
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 1.59
1453
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.65
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.59
1454
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.87
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 1.59
1455
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.17
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 1.59
1456
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.04
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1457
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.2
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1458
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 119.37
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1459
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.64
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1460
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 12.65
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1461
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.54
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1462
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 130.3
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1463
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 7.6
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.58
1464
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 5.08
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 1.57
1465
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 20.96
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.57
1466
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 178.33
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 1.57
1467
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 261.86
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 1.57
1468
Age: 20.5
Average rating: 380.3
TTFR rankings: 596
Ratio Superior: 1.57
1469
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 65.16
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.57
1470
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.65
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.56
1471
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 17.95
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.56
1472
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 17.95
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.56
1473
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.41
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 1.56
1474
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.54
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.56
1475
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.54
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.56
1476
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.7
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 1.56
1477
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.7
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 1.56
1478
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.07
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.55
1479
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 213.37
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 1.55
1480
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 405.73
TTFR rankings: 628
Ratio Superior: 1.55
1481
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.01
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.55
1482
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.84
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.55
1483
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.54
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.55
1484
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 35.58
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.55
1485
Age: 16
Average rating: 112.82
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 1.54
1486
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.54
1487
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 2.6
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 1.54
1488
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 183.59
TTFR rankings: 282
Ratio Superior: 1.54
1489
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 136.22
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1490
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.04
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1491
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 13.08
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1492
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.64
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1493
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 123.01
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1494
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.64
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1495
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.65
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1496
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.65
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1497
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.13
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1498
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 366.77
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1499
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.04
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1500
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 136.22
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 1.52

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников