The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1601
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 8.04
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 1.37
№1602
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.63
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.37
№1603
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 201.38
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 1.37
№1604
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.64
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.36
№1605
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.1
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.36
№1606
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.36
№1607
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 183.36
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 1.36
№1608
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 147.28
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 1.36
№1609
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.28
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.36
№1610
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.05
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 1.36
№1611
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 239.23
TTFR rankings: 324
Ratio Superior: 1.35
№1612
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.12
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.35
№1613
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 175.9
TTFR rankings: 238
Ratio Superior: 1.35
№1614
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.7
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.35
№1615
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.7
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.35
№1616
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.35
№1617
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.62
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 1.35
№1618
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.91
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.35
№1619
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.44
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 1.34
№1620
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 194.15
TTFR rankings: 261
Ratio Superior: 1.34
№1621
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.37
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.34
№1622
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.43
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 1.34
№1623
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.44
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.34
№1624
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 124.62
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 1.34
№1625
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.63
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.34
№1626
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.95
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1627
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 347.03
TTFR rankings: 463
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1628
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1629
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.75
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1630
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.75
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1631
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.75
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1632
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.78
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1633
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1634
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 160.94
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1635
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.71
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.33
№1636
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 9.08
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.32
№1637
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.19
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.32
№1638
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.96
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.32
№1639
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.78
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.32
№1640
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.32
№1641
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.85
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.32
№1642
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.23
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.31
№1643
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.23
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.31
№1644
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.82
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.31
№1645
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.17
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.31
№1646
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.44
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.31
№1647
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.32
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.31
№1648
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.58
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 1.31
№1649
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 212.19
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 1.31
№1650
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.26
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1651
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 132.73
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1652
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 216.07
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1653
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.95
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1654
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.46
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1655
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.01
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1656
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.22
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1657
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.15
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1658
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.1
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.3
№1659
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 120.51
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1660
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.69
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1661
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.78
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1662
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 264.92
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1663
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.73
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1664
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.76
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1665
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.52
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1666
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.85
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1667
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.26
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1668
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.31
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1669
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.46
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1670
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.01
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1671
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.16
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1672
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.71
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1673
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.9
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1674
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.59
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1675
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.43
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1676
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.15
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1677
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.46
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1678
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.44
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1679
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.69
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1680
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 94.02
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1681
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.32
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1682
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.76
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1683
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.9
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1684
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.98
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1685
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.71
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1686
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.7
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1687
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.77
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1688
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.43
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1689
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.62
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1690
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 201.38
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1691
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.98
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1692
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.78
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1693
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.54
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1694
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.16
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1695
Age: 20.5
Average rating: 371.14
TTFR rankings: 454
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1696
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1697
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 201.38
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1698
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.22
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1699
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.82
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1700
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.71
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.22
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
