The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1701
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.22
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1702
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.34
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1703
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.33
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1704
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.71
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1705
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.04
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1706
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.23
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1707
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.23
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1708
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.67
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1709
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.42
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.22
1710
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.92
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1711
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.43
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1712
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.43
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1713
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.84
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1714
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 211.16
TTFR rankings: 256
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1715
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.15
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1716
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 184.59
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1717
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.71
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1718
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1719
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.04
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1720
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.51
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1721
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 89.51
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.21
1722
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.71
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.2
1723
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.2
1724
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.15
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.2
1725
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.35
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.2
1726
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.2
1727
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.52
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.2
1728
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.88
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.2
1729
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.49
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.2
1730
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.95
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.19
1731
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 198.71
TTFR rankings: 237
Ratio Superior: 1.19
1732
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.32
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.19
1733
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.66
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.19
1734
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.81
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.19
1735
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 132.99
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 1.19
1736
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.6
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.19
1737
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.28
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.19
1738
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.33
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.18
1739
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.96
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.18
1740
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.07
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.18
1741
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.81
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.18
1742
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.38
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.18
1743
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.18
1744
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.53
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.18
1745
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.31
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.18
1746
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.17
1747
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.6
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.17
1748
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.17
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.17
1749
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.17
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.17
1750
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1751
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.42
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1752
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.38
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1753
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 183.55
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1754
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.33
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1755
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.91
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1756
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.07
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1757
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.66
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1758
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.5
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.16
1759
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.6
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.15
1760
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.6
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.15
1761
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.15
1762
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.44
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.15
1763
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.38
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.15
1764
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 183.55
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 1.14
1765
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.75
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.14
1766
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.85
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.14
1767
Age: 17
Average rating: 149.37
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 1.14
1768
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.69
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.13
1769
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.42
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.13
1770
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.84
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.13
1771
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.13
1772
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.56
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1773
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.35
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1774
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.91
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1775
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 165.76
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1776
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.14
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1777
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.14
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1778
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.32
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1779
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.32
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1780
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.67
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1781
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.52
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1782
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 166.43
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1783
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.07
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1784
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.6
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.12
1785
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.28
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1786
Age: 15
Average rating: 79.99
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1787
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 194.22
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1788
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1789
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.17
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1790
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.67
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1791
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.92
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1792
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 279.13
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1793
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.95
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.11
1794
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 165.76
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1795
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.23
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1796
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.81
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1797
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.16
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1798
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.16
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1799
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 176.2
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 1.1
1800
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.37
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.1

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников