The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1801
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.37
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№1802
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.97
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№1803
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 36.59
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1804
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.36
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1805
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.26
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1806
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.33
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1807
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.33
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1808
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.7
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1809
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.99
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1810
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.1
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№1811
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.65
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№1812
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.88
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№1813
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 180.11
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№1814
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.32
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№1815
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.97
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.07
№1816
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.76
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.07
№1817
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.1
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 1.07
№1818
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.01
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.07
№1819
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 184.76
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 1.07
№1820
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.43
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 1.06
№1821
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.63
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.06
№1822
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.86
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.06
№1823
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.71
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.06
№1824
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1825
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.1
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1826
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.89
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1827
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1828
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1829
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.1
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1830
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 171.26
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1831
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.83
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1832
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.7
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1833
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 176.28
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1834
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.36
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1835
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 162.28
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 1.05
№1836
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.38
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1837
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.23
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1838
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 184.76
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1839
Age: 19.4
Average rating: 256.71
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1840
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.91
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1841
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 279.29
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1842
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1843
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.52
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1844
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.52
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1845
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.71
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1846
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 6.75
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1847
Age: 20.7
Average rating: 377.1
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 1.04
№1848
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 116.92
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 1.03
№1849
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.36
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.03
№1850
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.32
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.03
№1851
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 133.03
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 1.03
№1852
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.03
№1853
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 154.72
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 1.03
№1854
Age: 15
Average rating: 80.05
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 1.02
№1855
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 147.56
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 1.02
№1856
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.01
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.02
№1857
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.01
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.02
№1858
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.7
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.02
№1859
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.02
№1860
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 215.26
TTFR rankings: 219
Ratio Superior: 1.02
№1861
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 171.26
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 1.02
№1862
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.01
№1863
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.37
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 1.01
№1864
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.31
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.01
№1865
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.86
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.01
№1866
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 166.61
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 1.01
№1867
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 269.15
TTFR rankings: 271
Ratio Superior: 1.01
№1868
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.01
№1869
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.36
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 1.01
№1870
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.98
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1
№1871
Age: 7.9
Average rating: 5
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 1
№1872
Age: 8
Average rating: 5
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 1
№1873
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.01
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1
№1874
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.01
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1
№1875
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 194.37
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 1
№1876
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1
№1877
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.07
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1
№1878
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 225.87
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 0.99
№1879
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.16
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.99
№1880
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.97
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 0.99
№1881
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.71
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.99
№1882
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 402.64
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 0.99
№1883
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.1
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 0.99
№1884
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 183.71
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 0.99
№1885
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.76
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.98
№1886
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.68
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 0.98
№1887
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.98
№1888
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.98
№1889
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.37
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.98
№1890
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.76
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 0.98
№1891
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.7
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 0.97
№1892
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 257.86
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 0.97
№1893
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.36
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.97
№1894
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.64
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 0.97
№1895
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.15
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 0.97
№1896
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.15
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 0.97
№1897
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.99
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 0.97
№1898
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.76
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 0.96
№1899
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.76
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 0.96
№1900
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.76
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.96
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
