The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1901
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.64
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 0.96
№1902
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.24
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.96
№1903
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.44
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.96
№1904
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 10.44
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.96
№1905
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.05
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 0.96
№1906
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.72
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.95
№1907
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.7
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.95
№1908
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 115.05
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 0.95
№1909
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.29
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.95
№1910
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.74
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.95
№1911
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.94
№1912
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.31
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.94
№1913
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.87
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.94
№1914
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.36
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 0.94
№1915
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.94
№1916
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.07
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1917
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.99
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1918
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.22
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1919
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.67
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1920
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 279.63
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1921
Age: 20.1
Average rating: 314.8
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1922
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 83.6
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1923
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1924
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1925
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 12.01
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1926
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.31
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1927
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.46
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1928
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 346.79
TTFR rankings: 316
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1929
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.25
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1930
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.81
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1931
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.86
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1932
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 176.93
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1933
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.15
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1934
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.64
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1935
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.72
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1936
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.62
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1937
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.69
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1938
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.69
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1939
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 47.87
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1940
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 165.91
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1941
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1942
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.25
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1943
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.74
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1944
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.31
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1945
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.84
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1946
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 79.64
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1947
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.25
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1948
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 168.88
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1949
Age: 15
Average rating: 79.97
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1950
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.91
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1951
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 118.32
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1952
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 35.08
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1953
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.52
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1954
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.52
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1955
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.25
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1956
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 9.08
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1957
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.52
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1958
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.13
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1959
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.52
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1960
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.46
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1961
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 8
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1962
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.74
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1963
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.37
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1964
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.07
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1965
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 346.79
TTFR rankings: 302
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1966
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 8.04
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1967
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.69
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1968
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.62
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1969
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.02
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1970
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.15
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1971
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.66
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1972
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.35
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1973
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 184.28
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1974
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 147.52
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1975
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.35
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1976
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.74
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1977
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.7
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1978
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.9
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1979
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 165.91
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1980
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.91
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1981
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 68.31
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1982
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.72
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1983
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 210.8
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1984
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.31
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1985
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.52
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1986
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.97
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1987
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.81
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1988
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.43
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1989
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.43
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1990
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.05
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1991
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.26
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1992
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.69
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1993
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 176.93
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1994
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1995
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1996
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.35
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1997
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.89
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1998
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 107.75
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1999
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.66
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№2000
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.66
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.83
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
