The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
2801
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.19
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2802
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 172.19
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2803
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.41
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2804
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.41
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2805
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.06
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2806
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.59
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2807
Age: 16
Average rating: 113
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2808
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.54
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2809
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.09
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2810
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.09
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2811
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.05
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.16
2812
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.92
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2813
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.92
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2814
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.55
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2815
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.89
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2816
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.45
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2817
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 38.95
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2818
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.57
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2819
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 117.33
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2820
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.63
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2821
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 6.59
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2822
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 6.6
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2823
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.61
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2824
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.42
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2825
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.3
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2826
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.3
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2827
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.73
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.15
2828
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.85
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2829
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.85
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2830
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.85
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2831
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.85
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2832
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.86
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2833
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.03
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2834
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.03
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2835
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2836
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 155.09
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2837
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.5
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2838
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 7.15
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2839
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.3
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2840
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.41
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2841
Age: 18
Average rating: 187.54
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2842
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.81
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2843
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.7
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2844
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.7
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2845
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 103.03
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2846
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.43
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.14
2847
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.93
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2848
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 180.34
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2849
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.73
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2850
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 52.98
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2851
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 52.98
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2852
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 90.87
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2853
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.57
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2854
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.25
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2855
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.25
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2856
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.07
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2857
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 185.65
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2858
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.74
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2859
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.74
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2860
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.59
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2861
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 187.49
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2862
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.51
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2863
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.51
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2864
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.51
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2865
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.51
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2866
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.69
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2867
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.03
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2868
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.19
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2869
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.85
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2870
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 7.9
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2871
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.61
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2872
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 7.94
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.13
2873
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.03
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2874
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.03
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2875
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.38
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2876
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 32.45
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2877
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.41
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2878
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.06
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2879
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.73
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2880
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.73
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2881
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.73
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2882
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.73
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2883
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 126.74
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2884
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.12
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2885
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.12
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2886
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.89
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2887
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.89
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2888
Age: 12
Average rating: 25.89
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.12
2889
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.05
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2890
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 52.98
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2891
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2892
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2893
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2894
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2895
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 26.6
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2896
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 97.63
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2897
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 125.29
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2898
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 163.29
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2899
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.57
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2900
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.57
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.11

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников