The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
2901
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 27.4
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2902
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.29
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2903
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.95
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2904
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.68
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2905
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.68
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2906
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.68
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2907
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.34
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.11
2908
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.1
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2909
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.74
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2910
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.03
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2911
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.03
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2912
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.64
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2913
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.64
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2914
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.64
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2915
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.79
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2916
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 180.5
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2917
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.22
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2918
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 30.14
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2919
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2920
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2921
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 10.17
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2922
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.21
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2923
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.2
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2924
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.18
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2925
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.87
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2926
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.87
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.1
2927
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 31.64
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2928
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 168.78
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2929
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.03
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2930
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 53.07
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2931
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.81
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2932
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 85.98
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2933
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.8
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2934
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.8
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2935
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 108.08
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2936
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.43
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2937
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 55.27
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2938
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.34
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2939
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 77.56
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2940
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.4
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2941
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.4
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2942
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.21
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2943
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.82
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2944
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.74
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2945
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.75
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2946
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.52
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2947
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.52
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2948
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.95
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2949
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 34.95
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.09
2950
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.56
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2951
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 23.56
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2952
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 262.9
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2953
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.79
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2954
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.97
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2955
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.47
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2956
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.42
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2957
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 12.42
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2958
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 99.43
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2959
Age: 17
Average rating: 149.68
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2960
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.95
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2961
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.11
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2962
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 25.11
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2963
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.93
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2964
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.93
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2965
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 90.89
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2966
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 78.82
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2967
Age: 13
Average rating: 39.7
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2968
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.34
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.08
2969
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 13.43
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2970
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.16
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2971
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.16
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2972
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.45
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2973
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 95.03
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2974
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 97.59
TTFR rankings: 7
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2975
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.06
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2976
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.06
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2977
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 168.78
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2978
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2979
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 113.75
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2980
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.81
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2981
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.81
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2982
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2983
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2984
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 14.42
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2985
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.87
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2986
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 43.87
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2987
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.72
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2988
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 14.72
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2989
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 177.55
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2990
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.26
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2991
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.26
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2992
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.26
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2993
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.26
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2994
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 15.26
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2995
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.21
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.07
2996
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.18
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.06
2997
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.67
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.06
2998
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 125.25
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.06
2999
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.71
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3000
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.71
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников