The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
3501
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 15.76
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3502
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 79.39
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3503
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3504
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 80.94
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3505
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 64.88
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3506
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 65.53
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3507
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3508
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3509
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.43
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3510
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 99.24
TTFR rankings: 6
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3511
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.13
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3512
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 168.83
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3513
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.03
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3514
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.03
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3515
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.03
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3516
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 51.42
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3517
Age: 15
Average rating: 68.76
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3518
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.45
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3519
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.9
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3520
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.45
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3521
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.75
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3522
Age: 11
Average rating: 17.75
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3523
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.05
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3524
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.05
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3525
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.05
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3526
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 90.77
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3527
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 72.72
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.06
3528
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.34
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3529
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.34
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3530
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.34
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3531
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 55.34
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3532
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 37.36
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3533
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 74.87
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3534
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 18.78
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3535
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3536
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3537
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.27
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3538
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 19.64
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3539
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 19.64
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3540
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 19.64
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3541
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.75
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3542
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.75
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3543
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.75
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3544
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.75
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3545
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 59.67
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3546
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.32
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3547
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 20.32
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3548
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 40.67
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3549
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 40.67
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3550
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 40.67
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3551
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.54
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3552
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.54
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3553
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.54
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3554
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.54
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3555
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.54
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3556
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 20.54
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3557
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 83.39
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3558
Age: 20.4
Average rating: 343.07
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3559
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 43.47
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3560
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 21.98
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3561
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 44.33
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.05
3562
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3563
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3564
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.97
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3565
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.97
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3566
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 198
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3567
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 124.05
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3568
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.86
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3569
Age: 14
Average rating: 50.12
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3570
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 104.4
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3571
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 78.41
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3572
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 341.35
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3573
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.39
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3574
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.39
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3575
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.4
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3576
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.4
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3577
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 56.47
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.04
3578
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 115.89
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3579
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.56
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3580
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.56
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3581
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 60.58
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3582
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 62.63
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3583
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 31.46
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3584
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 31.46
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3585
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 31.46
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3586
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 127.04
TTFR rankings: 4
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3587
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 67.01
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3588
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 34.13
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3589
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 34.13
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3590
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 34.13
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3591
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 71.03
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3592
Age: 13
Average rating: 36.17
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3593
Age: 13
Average rating: 36.17
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3594
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 74.87
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3595
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 78.41
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3596
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 78.41
TTFR rankings: 2
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3597
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.75
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.03
3598
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 207.47
TTFR rankings: 5
Ratio Superior: 0.02
3599
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 127.04
TTFR rankings: 3
Ratio Superior: 0.02
3600
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 43.47
TTFR rankings: 1
Ratio Superior: 0.02

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников