The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1401
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.33
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1402
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.82
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1403
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 168.32
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1404
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.18
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1405
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.18
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1406
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.67
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1407
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.84
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.98
№1408
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 11.65
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.97
№1409
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 143.6
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 1.97
№1410
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.87
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.97
№1411
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.53
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.97
№1412
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.37
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№1413
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 198.34
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№1414
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.24
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№1415
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.72
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№1416
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.05
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 1.96
№1417
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.44
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1418
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 65.06
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1419
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.89
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1420
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.64
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1421
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 337.06
TTFR rankings: 657
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1422
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.69
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1423
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.69
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1424
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 119.22
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1425
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 81.71
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 1.95
№1426
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.96
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1427
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.16
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1428
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.85
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1429
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.1
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1430
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.33
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1431
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.73
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.94
№1432
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.71
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1433
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.1
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1434
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.22
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1435
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.77
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1436
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.73
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 1.93
№1437
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.8
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№1438
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.32
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№1439
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.16
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№1440
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№1441
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.85
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№1442
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 61.08
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.92
№1443
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.71
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№1444
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.76
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№1445
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.11
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№1446
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.17
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№1447
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.29
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№1448
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.29
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№1449
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.73
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 1.91
№1450
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.16
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 1.9
№1451
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.59
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 1.9
№1452
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 295.05
TTFR rankings: 560
Ratio Superior: 1.9
№1453
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.65
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.9
№1454
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.03
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.9
№1455
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 198.34
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 1.9
№1456
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.71
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 1.9
№1457
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.03
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№1458
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.63
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№1459
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.17
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№1460
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.82
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№1461
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.32
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№1462
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.44
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№1463
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.44
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№1464
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.82
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.89
№1465
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.29
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№1466
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.24
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№1467
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.66
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№1468
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 119.22
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№1469
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.67
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№1470
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.19
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№1471
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 65.06
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 1.88
№1472
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 200.68
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 1.87
№1473
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.22
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.87
№1474
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.52
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.87
№1475
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.1
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 1.87
№1476
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.24
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№1477
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 81.71
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№1478
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 185.16
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№1479
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 85.05
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№1480
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 113.09
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 1.86
№1481
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 285.79
TTFR rankings: 530
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№1482
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.82
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№1483
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.27
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№1484
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.72
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№1485
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 215.23
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№1486
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 242.65
TTFR rankings: 448
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№1487
Age: 15
Average rating: 66.11
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 1.85
№1488
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.85
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№1489
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.16
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№1490
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 150.56
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№1491
Age: 19.4
Average rating: 253.57
TTFR rankings: 466
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№1492
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.87
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№1493
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 225.47
TTFR rankings: 414
Ratio Superior: 1.84
№1494
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.64
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.83
№1495
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.66
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.83
№1496
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.85
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 1.83
№1497
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 65.06
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.83
№1498
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.1
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.82
№1499
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.09
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.82
№1500
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.09
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.82
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
