The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1301
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.79
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.14
1302
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.15
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 2.14
1303
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.65
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 2.14
1304
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.68
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.14
1305
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.8
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1306
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1307
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.14
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1308
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.52
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1309
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 289.29
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1310
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1311
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.33
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1312
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.33
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1313
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.67
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1314
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.23
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 2.13
1315
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.98
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1316
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.33
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1317
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.79
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1318
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.79
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1319
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.28
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1320
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.63
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1321
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.86
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1322
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.07
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1323
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.08
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1324
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.08
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1325
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.62
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1326
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 284.97
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1327
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.8
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1328
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.63
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1329
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.86
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1330
Age: 20.6
Average rating: 339.34
TTFR rankings: 712
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1331
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.87
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1332
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.64
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1333
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.75
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1334
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.79
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1335
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.79
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1336
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.15
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1337
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.02
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1338
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.74
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1339
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.22
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1340
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.22
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1341
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.11
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1342
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.53
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1343
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.54
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1344
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.86
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1345
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 289.29
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1346
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.51
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1347
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.23
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1348
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.48
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1349
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.68
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1350
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.59
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1351
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.14
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1352
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.1
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1353
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 200.35
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1354
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.98
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1355
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 150.13
TTFR rankings: 307
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1356
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.52
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1357
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.22
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1358
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.48
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1359
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.56
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1360
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.65
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1361
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.16
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1362
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.73
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1363
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.52
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1364
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.22
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1365
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 167.92
TTFR rankings: 341
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1366
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.63
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1367
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 119.17
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1368
Age: 20.1
Average rating: 327.52
TTFR rankings: 665
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1369
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.62
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1370
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 289.29
TTFR rankings: 587
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1371
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.37
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1372
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.37
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1373
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.77
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1374
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.51
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1375
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.87
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1376
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 113.04
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1377
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.2
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1378
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.23
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1379
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.02
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1380
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.33
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1381
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 148.29
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1382
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.75
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1383
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 208.25
TTFR rankings: 418
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1384
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.54
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1385
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.37
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 2
1386
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.39
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 2
1387
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 184.79
TTFR rankings: 369
Ratio Superior: 2
1388
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 81.64
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 2
1389
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 345.63
TTFR rankings: 690
Ratio Superior: 2
1390
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.08
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1391
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.73
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1392
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.73
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1393
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.57
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1394
Age: 17
Average rating: 120.58
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1395
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.61
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1396
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.13
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1397
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.1
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1398
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.65
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1399
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 11.59
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1400
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.54
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 1.98

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников