The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1201
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.2
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 2.33
1202
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.97
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 2.32
1203
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.97
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 2.32
1204
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.71
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 2.32
1205
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.5
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.32
1206
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.12
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.32
1207
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.87
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.32
1208
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.87
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.32
1209
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.79
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.32
1210
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.2
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 2.31
1211
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.25
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 2.31
1212
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.23
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.31
1213
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.69
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.31
1214
Age: 9
Average rating: 11.28
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.3
1215
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.02
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 2.3
1216
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.62
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 2.3
1217
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.82
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1218
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.82
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1219
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 10.9
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1220
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.34
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1221
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.52
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1222
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.53
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1223
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.79
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1224
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 11.37
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1225
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 69.97
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1226
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.81
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.29
1227
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.71
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 2.28
1228
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.22
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 2.28
1229
Age: 20.5
Average rating: 337.19
TTFR rankings: 767
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1230
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1231
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.12
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1232
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.34
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1233
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.53
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1234
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 284.97
TTFR rankings: 647
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1235
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.32
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1236
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.14
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1237
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.15
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1238
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.28
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 2.27
1239
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 249.83
TTFR rankings: 565
Ratio Superior: 2.26
1240
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.14
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.26
1241
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.63
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1242
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.78
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1243
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 142.98
TTFR rankings: 322
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1244
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.58
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1245
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.8
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1246
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.8
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1247
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.58
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1248
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.83
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.25
1249
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.14
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.24
1250
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.55
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 2.24
1251
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.36
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 2.23
1252
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.52
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 2.23
1253
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.53
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 2.23
1254
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.23
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 2.23
1255
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.2
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.23
1256
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.24
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 2.23
1257
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.15
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 2.22
1258
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.24
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 2.22
1259
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 180.83
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 2.22
1260
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.14
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.22
1261
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.14
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.22
1262
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.97
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 2.22
1263
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.78
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 2.22
1264
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 174.22
TTFR rankings: 386
Ratio Superior: 2.22
1265
Age: 20.2
Average rating: 331.52
TTFR rankings: 734
Ratio Superior: 2.21
1266
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.15
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.21
1267
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.79
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.21
1268
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.2
1269
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.02
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 2.2
1270
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.82
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 2.2
1271
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 10.92
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 2.2
1272
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.58
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1273
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.81
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1274
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1275
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.5
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1276
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.42
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1277
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.31
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1278
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.66
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1279
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.66
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1280
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.14
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.19
1281
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.64
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 2.18
1282
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.32
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 2.18
1283
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.83
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.18
1284
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.23
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.18
1285
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.15
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 2.17
1286
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.88
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 2.16
1287
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.53
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 2.16
1288
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.2
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 2.16
1289
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.24
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1290
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.14
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1291
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 84.97
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1292
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.34
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1293
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.99
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1294
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.02
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1295
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.52
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1296
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.49
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1297
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.49
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.15
1298
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.52
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.14
1299
Age: 20.4
Average rating: 337.06
TTFR rankings: 722
Ratio Superior: 2.14
1300
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.78
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.14

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников